2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11581-022-04820-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical properties of NaSICON: a brief review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, overall, the different compositions have similar fracture toughness ranging from 1.2 to 1.6 MPaÁm 1/2 . In the literature, a strong link between the glassy phase content and the fracture toughness results was suggested [60,61]. However, in the current work the glassy phase and NASICON main phase seem to exhibit similar mechanical properties; thus, no influence of the glassy phase content on the mechanical properties of the specimens can be observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Thus, overall, the different compositions have similar fracture toughness ranging from 1.2 to 1.6 MPaÁm 1/2 . In the literature, a strong link between the glassy phase content and the fracture toughness results was suggested [60,61]. However, in the current work the glassy phase and NASICON main phase seem to exhibit similar mechanical properties; thus, no influence of the glassy phase content on the mechanical properties of the specimens can be observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…In previous stripping experiments, NZSPO has already shown electrochemical stability against metallic sodium as well as sodium−tin alloys, and thus, is not reduced at low potentials. 9,33,34 By insertion of the relatively thick and 95% dense NZSPO interlayer, a model electrode/interlayer combination was formed that protects the promising sulfide SE from chemical decomposition. To investigate the applicability, chemical stability, and potentially improved stability of the sulfide electrolyte, the following tests were conducted.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their disadvantage is their strong reactivity with typical anode and cathode materials. 8 Chloride and oxide solid electrolytes are chemically more stable; however, oxides as typical ceramics feature high Young′s and shear moduli, 9 and halides do not show sufficient ionic conductivities. 10 Borohydrides require an intricate synthesis procedure and are not easily available.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanical properties are a determining factor for the following factors affecting SSE performance: (1) Lithium dendrite suppression: High elastic stiffness (<10 GPa , ) and shear modulus of the SSE should be equal to or greater than those of Li, which have been experimentally determined as 1.9 and 3.1 GPa. (2) High fracture toughness: High fracture toughness allows for a thinner electrolyte, enabling desirable cell operational properties like high power output during discharge, high energy density, and lower cell resistance. , Recent studies , discovered that the critical current, which causes cell failure when dendrites grow during charging, is linked to the solid electrolyte’s fracture strength and grain boundary conductivity. As the fracture strength increases, the critical current also increases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) High fracture toughness: High fracture toughness allows for a thinner electrolyte, enabling desirable cell operational properties like high power output during discharge, high energy density, and lower cell resistance. 25 , 26 Recent studies 25 , 27 discovered that the critical current, which causes cell failure when dendrites grow during charging, is linked to the solid electrolyte’s fracture strength and grain boundary conductivity. As the fracture strength increases, the critical current also increases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%