“…Some consistent research conclusions were reached that the recycled concrete exhibited lower strength than ordinary concrete [ 4 ], and recycled aggregates caused more significant shrinkage and water absorption in the resulting concrete [ 1 , 6 ]. It is worthy to note that the adopted recycled aggregates were resulted from broad sources, e.g., demolished concrete [ 7 , 8 , 9 ], bricks [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ], and ceramic tile [ 15 ], and the uncertainty surrounding the sources of recycle aggregates could cause variability in the resulting concrete. Some existing scholarly works concluded that: (1) the compressive strength of recycled concrete was 37% or more lower than that of ordinary concrete, and the adhered mortar had an adverse influence on the concrete’s strength [ 16 ], (2) the replacement ratios of recycled coarse aggregates within 25% or recycled fine aggregates within 30% rarely exhibited inferior effects on the strength and durability of the resulting concrete [ 17 ], (3) the recycled concrete failed in shear mode with a larger peak strain, but the ductility of recycled concrete was decreased compared with ordinary concrete [ 17 ].…”