2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2018.07.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical response of double-network gels with dynamic bonds under multi-cycle deformation

Abstract: Mechanical behavior of double-network (DN) gels with covalent and non-covalent bonds under multi-cycle loading depends strongly on time, strain rate and deformation program. A model is developed for the viscoelastic and viscoplastic responses of a polymer network with permanent and temporary junctions. Viscoelasticity is modeled as breakage and reformation of temporary bonds driven by thermal fluctuations. Viscoplasticity is treated as sliding of permanent junctions with respect to their initial positions in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 75 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between eqs 1–8 and the governing equations in viscoelastoplasticity of DN gels proposed in our previous studies consists in the following: (a) unlike, the transient network is presumed to be inhomogeneous and composed of meso‐regions with various activation energies for breakage of temporary bonds, (b) contrary to, the strain energy density of the permanent network is adopted in the neo‐Hookean form, and the only mechanism of plastic flow (due to inter‐chain interaction) is taken into account. These simplifications allow eqs 1 and 6 to be presented in the novel form convenient for numerical simulation, and an explicit expression to be derived for elongation ratio under self‐recovery, see eq , which serves as one of the main results of this work.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between eqs 1–8 and the governing equations in viscoelastoplasticity of DN gels proposed in our previous studies consists in the following: (a) unlike, the transient network is presumed to be inhomogeneous and composed of meso‐regions with various activation energies for breakage of temporary bonds, (b) contrary to, the strain energy density of the permanent network is adopted in the neo‐Hookean form, and the only mechanism of plastic flow (due to inter‐chain interaction) is taken into account. These simplifications allow eqs 1 and 6 to be presented in the novel form convenient for numerical simulation, and an explicit expression to be derived for elongation ratio under self‐recovery, see eq , which serves as one of the main results of this work.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%