2012
DOI: 10.1080/00038628.2011.641736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical ventilation in recently built Dutch homes: technical shortcomings, possibilities for improvement, perceived indoor environment and health effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Faults included failed duct attachments to unit, air recirculation due to incorrect connections, erratic cycling from low to high speed outside occupant control, clogged outdoor air inlet, ERV turned off by occupants, and poor control strategies and operation (or lack thereof) of CFIS. Similar faults have been commonly reported elsewhere, including low airflow, noise, unclean systems, poor design and/or installation, insufficient maintenance, operational errors, blocked air intakes and recirculation in ERV/HRV (Balvers et al, 2012;Hill, 1998;Offermann, 2009). Clearly, even in high performance homes, ventilation system design should be improved and 7 possibly simplified, and commissioning and verification are required, as is occupant education on building systems operation.…”
Section: Ventilation System Descriptions and Installed Performance Assupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Faults included failed duct attachments to unit, air recirculation due to incorrect connections, erratic cycling from low to high speed outside occupant control, clogged outdoor air inlet, ERV turned off by occupants, and poor control strategies and operation (or lack thereof) of CFIS. Similar faults have been commonly reported elsewhere, including low airflow, noise, unclean systems, poor design and/or installation, insufficient maintenance, operational errors, blocked air intakes and recirculation in ERV/HRV (Balvers et al, 2012;Hill, 1998;Offermann, 2009). Clearly, even in high performance homes, ventilation system design should be improved and 7 possibly simplified, and commissioning and verification are required, as is occupant education on building systems operation.…”
Section: Ventilation System Descriptions and Installed Performance Assupporting
confidence: 70%
“…138 In 2012, a study of 299 mechanically ventilated Dutch homes identified major problems with the installation, operation and maintenance of ventilation systems in homes. 139 Researchers found dust and dirt in the air supply ducts in 67% of houses fitted with mechanical ventilation heat recovery (MVHR). Air filters were dirty in almost half, with insufficient ventilation in at least one room, and exhaust air being recirculated in more than half of houses with MVHR.…”
Section: Ventilation In the Homementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most occupants did not control ventilation systems as recommended, nor use the highest ventilation settings due to noise levels. 139…”
Section: Ventilation In the Homementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of ventilation system performance faults have been reported in California DERs and new homes (Less et al, 2012;Less, 2012;Offermann, 2009). Faults including low airflow, noise, unclean systems, poor design and/or installation, insufficient maintenance, operational errors, blocked air intakes and recirculation in Energy Recovery Ventilators (ERVs) and Heat Recovery Ventilators (HRVs), have also been commonly reported in Canadian and Dutch homes (Balvers et al, 2012;Hill, 1998). DERs using complex ventilation systems as part of their retrofit strategy should include substantial system commissioning, occupant education efforts, and potentially either periodic re-commissioning or some form of automated fault-detection.…”
Section: Ventilationmentioning
confidence: 99%