1996
DOI: 10.1557/jmr.1996.0276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanics of shaped crystal growth from the melt

Abstract: We present the numerical formulation of the thermal stress driven steady-state dislocation generation during the growth of shaped crystals from the melt, with Czochralski (CZ) growth of solid cylinder III -V compound semiconductors as an example. We use and compare the Haasen-Alexander model, coupling dislocation multiplication and creep strain rates, and the Jordan model, based on thermoelastic stresses. Growth parameters may be chosen so as to produce an overall approximately flat interface, leading to reduc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The parameters including in the HAS model are identified for Ge, Si, InSb, InP, GaAs, and so on [32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Quantitative Methods For Dislocation Density Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The parameters including in the HAS model are identified for Ge, Si, InSb, InP, GaAs, and so on [32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Quantitative Methods For Dislocation Density Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 3 shows the dislocation density distributions for a GaAs bulk single crystal at 35,87,191,312,451 and 607 min after the CZ growth starts [44]. High dislocation density appears at the central and peripheral regions of the bulk single crystal.…”
Section: Quantitative Methods For Dislocation Density Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The parameters including in the HAS model are identified for Ge, Si, InSb, InP, GaAs, and so on [10][11][12]20]. …”
Section: Has Model For Uniaxial Stress Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In principle, the reduction of dislocation densities from 10 6 -10 8 cm À 2 to as low as 10 3 -10 4 cm À 2 may lead to an improvement in the cell performance (from 13-14% to 420%). Hence, efforts have been made to suppress the harmful impact of dislocations on cell performance, to avoid the formation of dislocations during crystal growth [8,9] and to remove dislocations after ingot growth [10][11][12][13]. Despite numerous studies on the passivation of dislocations and the gettering of fast-diffusing metal impurities from dislocations, the improvement of cell performance after these processes is still very limited in regions with high dislocation densities (410 6 cm À 2 ) [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%