2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevapplied.12.024006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism Behind Angularly Asymmetric Diffraction in Phase-Gradient Metasurfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, studies have reported asymmetric optical properties for different directions by optimizing the geometric conditions of metasurfaces, such as an asymmetricdiffraction optical device using a difference in phase delay caused by tuning the parameter of the depth of the groove [38] or an asymmetric propagation device using the difference in intensity and phase delay of electromagnetic waves caused by the lossy planar chiral structure [39]. Additionally, asymmetric transmission studies using a nanopolymerization technique, such as multichannel polarization conversion elements using anisotropic diffraction stripe structures in which nematic molecule materials are homogeneously arranged, have been reported [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, studies have reported asymmetric optical properties for different directions by optimizing the geometric conditions of metasurfaces, such as an asymmetricdiffraction optical device using a difference in phase delay caused by tuning the parameter of the depth of the groove [38] or an asymmetric propagation device using the difference in intensity and phase delay of electromagnetic waves caused by the lossy planar chiral structure [39]. Additionally, asymmetric transmission studies using a nanopolymerization technique, such as multichannel polarization conversion elements using anisotropic diffraction stripe structures in which nematic molecule materials are homogeneously arranged, have been reported [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, these AMs for AT are generally composed of multiple unit cells, which not only adds the design complexities but also poses a challenge for sample fabrication in higher frequencies [23]. Meanwhile, more unit cells in AMs can bring more sound absorption due to multiple reflection effect [24,25], which may reduce the performance of AT. Therefore, AMs with simplified design is extremely desirable to control wave propagation, in particular, to realize AT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, for high-order PGM diffractions, m leads to a new set of diffraction equations expressed as [21]: , ( ) , ( ) Gp   is the reciprocal lattice vector, n is the diffraction order, and L=m-n is the propagation number of multiple internal total reflections inside the PGM, i.e., the number of times that the wave travels inside the PGM. Such an additional process of multiple internal total reflections can lead to angularly asymmetric absorption [22][23][24][25] in a PGM with some loss, because the absorption efficiency is also related to m. Therefore, in addition to the phase gradient, the integer number of unit cells m in a supercell is another degree of freedom that can be employed to control the light propagation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%