1972
DOI: 10.2307/3573271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms of Acute Injury in the Gamma-Irradiated Chicken: Effects of a Protracted or a Split-Dose Exposure on the Fine Structure of the Microvasculature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was contradicted by Withers et al (1980) and discussion has continued until now (Graham et al 1990;Jain 1988;Msirikale et al 1987;Rose et al 1999;Waters et al 1996), though as yet without any input in the form of ultrastructural tracer data. The resulting acute episode of vascular hyperpermeability results from endothelial cell lysis or opening of intercellular junctions (Stearner and Sanderson 1972). The resulting acute episode of vascular hyperpermeability results from endothelial cell lysis or opening of intercellular junctions (Stearner and Sanderson 1972).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This was contradicted by Withers et al (1980) and discussion has continued until now (Graham et al 1990;Jain 1988;Msirikale et al 1987;Rose et al 1999;Waters et al 1996), though as yet without any input in the form of ultrastructural tracer data. The resulting acute episode of vascular hyperpermeability results from endothelial cell lysis or opening of intercellular junctions (Stearner and Sanderson 1972). The resulting acute episode of vascular hyperpermeability results from endothelial cell lysis or opening of intercellular junctions (Stearner and Sanderson 1972).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting acute episode of vascular hyperpermeability results from endothelial cell lysis or opening of intercellular junctions (Stearner and Sanderson 1972). In such "fractionated" protocols, repair processes can occur, microvessel integrity can be preserved (Rubin and Casarett 1966) and the tissues tolerate sequential small doses much better than a single large dose (Stearner and Sanderson 1972;Stearner et al 1961). This damage leaves physical gaps in the microvessel wall, permitting passive fluxes into the extravascular compartment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sparing effect of dose fractionation (SDF) has been demonstrated in a number of organisms involving cell killing, microvasculature damage and pupariation delay as parameters [1,5,9,10,19,21 ]. When given as postirradiation treatment after single exposure, caffeine increases the delay in a synergistic manner.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sparing effect of dose fractionation (SDF) has been demonstrated in a number of organisms involving cell killing, microvasculature damage and pupariation delay as parameters [1,5,9,10,19,21 ]. The sparing effect of dose fractionation (SDF) has been demonstrated in a number of organisms involving cell killing, microvasculature damage and pupariation delay as parameters [1,5,9,10,19,21 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%