1999
DOI: 10.1071/wr97045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms of recovery after fire by rodents in the Australian environment: a review

Abstract: Possible impacts and mechanisms of response by Australian rodents to fire are identified and discussed in relation to the literature. Although there is considerable information on patterns of population response, there is little concerning the effect of fire on individual behaviour, mortality, or interactions at the community level. The evidence that links observed responses of rodents to habitat variables is largely correlative, and theories on mechanisms of recovery are often simplified or speculative. Exper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
98
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
98
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S3). The risks of predation on small mammals both by birds and mammals are probably higher when 312 vegetation cover is low because small mammals can be more easily spotted and captured by 313 predators at sites with poor vegetation cover (Sutherland and Dickman, 1999). In extremely dry 314 years such as 2012, areas with higher vegetation cover probably also provided more abundant food 315 than areas which are mowed or grazed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S3). The risks of predation on small mammals both by birds and mammals are probably higher when 312 vegetation cover is low because small mammals can be more easily spotted and captured by 313 predators at sites with poor vegetation cover (Sutherland and Dickman, 1999). In extremely dry 314 years such as 2012, areas with higher vegetation cover probably also provided more abundant food 315 than areas which are mowed or grazed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many can shelter from the fire front in refuges, they subsequently have to cope with an environment that deprives them abruptly of vegetation cover and food. The consequences are twofold: (i) increased exposure to predators while foraging in the open [2,3] and (ii) for most species a decrease in food availability [4]. To compensate for the latter, small mammals with their inherently high energy requirements and limited body fat stores [5,6] will have to either intensify foraging or reduce energy expenditure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings suggest low intensity prescribed burning may have implications for fungivorous and insectivorous fauna, as spatial patterns of highly decayed CWD alter the availability of saproxylic fungi and invertebrates [2,46]. Materials in late stages of decay are known to have a larger community of fungi, including not only early successional fungi such as brown and white rot fungi, but also other taxa such as mycorrhizae and litter decomposing fungi [47,48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%