“…[8c, 21] Clearly,this is not asuitable indicator for chargea llocation into the ring because the average bond lengths do not substantially change for cationic three-coordinate boron complexes of I Mes . [19,22] With structurale lucidations of 4 and 5 + + in hand, we highlight three resonance structures to sufficiently describe the bondings ituation for the borasilene entity in 4 (Scheme 1): (i)the zwitterionic formulation 4 A with the negative chargea t the silicon centera nd the positive charge at the boron atom, (ii)the zwitterionic formulation 4 B with the negative charge at the silicon atom and the positive charged elocalized to the NHI, and (iii)the borasilene formulation 4 C with ac ovalentB =Si double bond. Distinct structural parameters of 4 support particular resonance structures, that is (a)the pyramidalized geometry at the silicon site and the trigonal-planar geometry aroundt he boron atom (in favor of 4 A , 4 B ), (b) the BÀSi distance being only slightly shorter than that in Aldridge'sb orylsilylene (in favor of 4 A , 4 B ), and( c) the BÀNa nd the CÀN imino bond lengths being longera nd shorter,r espectively,t han those in the ligand-centered cation 5 + + (in favor of 4 A ).…”