Media Ethics

Christians, Clifford G.; Fackler, Mark; Richardson, Kathy Brittain; Kreshel, Peggy J.; Woods, Robert H.

doi:10.4324/9781315663579

Cited by 9 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The current UN Resolution 217A of the General Assembly on the declaration of human rights and the UN Covenant prohibiting war propaganda should be updated and extended to artificial intelligence. Christians et al (2020) provided ethical guidelines on moral reasoning. The authors highlighted Aristotle's Mean on moral virtue as "middle state determined by practical wisdom" (p. 22).…”

Section: Media Ethics Compassmentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2024

AJMMC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Media Ethics Compassmentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2024

AJMMC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The problem of the ethical dimension of journalism is related to journalists' morality regarding the good and bad actions of a media worker (journalist) in carrying out their journalistic activities (Duncan & Keeble, 2022;Rachmawaty et al, 2022;Ward, 2020, p. 309). An ethical dimension in journalism practice is needed to become gatekeeping of journalism activities so that journalists' actions gain control from within themselves (their beliefs) and from outside themselves in the form of normative ethics (Christians, 2005;Christians et al, 2017). The nature of the ethical dimension of journalism is applied ethics that guide the social practice of journalism, which binds journalists to the principles of telling the truth, minimizing losses, and being responsible for the formation of public opinion (Ward, 2021, p. 7).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Ethical Experience of Online Journalists in Avoiding Trial by the Press

Wahyudi,

Sujoko

2024

JKJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Trial by the press is an ethically prohibited practice in journalism activities in Indonesia. However, it still occurs in various online media, meaning that there is something wrong with the ethical actions of online media journalists. This research aims to reveal the ethical experiences of online media journalists in avoiding trial by the press. This research method uses a phenomenological approach by conducting interviews with five online media journalists and a literature study of regulatory trials by the press in Indonesia. The results show that trial by the press has been institutionally regulated to be avoided by journalists, especially in Law 40/1999, Journalistic Code of Ethics from the Press Council, PWI, and AJI. However, journalistic ethical principles in institutional regulations are no longer compatible with the working mechanisms of online media, thus creating a dilemma for online media journalists to choose between the two. However, online media journalists do not view institutional regulations and online media working mechanisms as dualism in the practice of online journalism. Their experience in elaborating institutional regulations and online media working mechanisms can minimize the occurrence of trials by the press. We concluded that contextual and situational elaboration of institutional regulations and working mechanisms of online media can produce an authentic meaning for journalists to avoid trial by the press in online media.

show abstract

“…Quantitative methodologies certainly enable the identification and quantification of a good number of companies, but the statistical treatment used means that divergent data are dispensed with, either licitly due to error or illicitly through the elimination of discordant data. The second case lies at the other extreme and occurs because qualitative case analysis is used to understand complex company reality, forgetting the scientific rigor that must accompany any attempt at attaining the general option (Christians et al , 2015; Thiel et al , 2013; Hoffman et al , 2014).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Moreover, the problem that this work addresses, and will in consequence provide an answer to, revolves around the possibility and advisability of using single cases within the framework of scientific hypothetical-deductive methodology. Concretely, the utility of case analysis in scientific methodology will be determined and argued from the perspective of business ethics so as to increase the scientific rigor of its use in research (Christians et al , 2015; Hoffman et al , 2014), giving scientific character to ethical reflection based on a single data.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Single case research methodology: a tool for moral imagination in business ethics

Retolaza

San-José

2017

MRR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose -Although there are often utilized the case research method for teaching purposes, it is not a method employed to move forward in scientific research into business ethics, perhaps due to criticism levelled against it. The precise aim of this work is to expound and argue for its use within the framework of scientific hypotheticaldeductive methodology. Design/methodology/approach -The opportunities offered by this methodological approach, both from an inductive (Eisenhardt, 1989;Dyer and Wilkins, 1991) and a deductive perspective (Yin, 1993;Carson et al., 2000) have been wasted, creating a need for scientific contributions within this area; hence this study. It was carried on a theoretical approach of the use of single case applied to corporate management based on religion and spirituality inclusion. Findings -The results obtained indicate that the single case research method makes it possible to put forward alternative hypotheses to the dominant hypothesis, making contributions to the theory. Concretely, the scientific legitimacy of its use is justified by what it has been called "possibilistic hypothesis" for what it is not necessary to collect a large data or make an empiric research. Practical implications -In the field of business ethics these hypotheses (possibilistics) make alternatives stand out that widen the moral responsibility of decision-makers. It implies an open mind for decision-makers and rigorous arguments using just a single case. Reinforce and make them easier based on moral imagination improvement. Originality/value -It is complex the decision process, but this rich method, the singlecase study could permit establishing rigorous and robust decisions easily. It is not use the case study widely for management, but this perspective could enrich and increase its use.

show abstract

Media Ethics

Cited by 9 publications

References 0 publications

Untitled

Untitled

The Ethical Experience of Online Journalists in Avoiding Trial by the Press

Single case research methodology: a tool for moral imagination in business ethics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About