2007
DOI: 10.1080/08838150701308010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Media Ownership Regulations and Local News Programming on Broadcast Television: An Empirical Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the media ownership debate has itself become especially newsworthy, with mounting evidence that media consolidation has been associated with a degradation of local and community news coverage. Ownership of stations by media conglomerates has been linked to a considerable decrease in the amount of televised local public affairs programming (Yan and Napoli, 2004) as well as local news programming (Napoli and Yan, 2007). With television remaining the main source of news for more than 69 percent of Americans, and with 52 percent of Americans still regularly watching local televised news (Pew, 2008), the deleterious effects of consolidation are very real.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition, the media ownership debate has itself become especially newsworthy, with mounting evidence that media consolidation has been associated with a degradation of local and community news coverage. Ownership of stations by media conglomerates has been linked to a considerable decrease in the amount of televised local public affairs programming (Yan and Napoli, 2004) as well as local news programming (Napoli and Yan, 2007). With television remaining the main source of news for more than 69 percent of Americans, and with 52 percent of Americans still regularly watching local televised news (Pew, 2008), the deleterious effects of consolidation are very real.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Much of the evidence in support of this assumption is, at this point, primarily anecdotal (see FCC, 1999c), though an econometric analysis prepared for Sinclair Broadcasting found that common ownership led to a small increase in the probability that a station would cover local news at all, but there was no statistically significant difference in terms of the amount of news provided (Crandall, 2003). More recent research, however, found a negative relationship between duopoly ownership and local news provision (Napoli & Yan, in press).…”
Section: Localism: Influences Of Ownership Structures and Competitionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To the extent, however, that the focus of this study is on local programming, it is questionable whether such economies of scale can be achieved across stations in different markets, when the programming at issue is being produced exclusively for a single local market. This may explain why, up to this point, there has been relatively little consistent evidence of a meaningful relationship between station group ownership or station group size and the provision of informational programming (Napoli, 2002, 2004; Napoli & Yan, in press; Spavins et al, 2002; Wirth & Wollert, 1979).…”
Section: Localism: Influences Of Ownership Structures and Competitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical studies Steiner (1952), Beebe (1977), Spence and Owen (1975), Wildman and Owen (1985), Gal-Or and Dukes (2003), Gabszewicz et al (2004), Anderson and Coate (2005) Empirical studies Vertical diversity Dominick and Pearce (1976), Litman (1979), Lin (1995), Napoli (1997), Einstein (2004aEinstein ( , 2004b) Horizontal diversity Einstein (2004aEinstein ( , 2004b With regard to empirical studies that investigate the relationship between the ownership rule and program diversity, Napoli and Yan (2007) and Yan and Park (2009) examined the impact of relaxation of the ownership rule on the programming of local television broadcasters in the United States. Berry and Waldfogel (2001) investigated the impact of relaxation of the ownership rule on radio programming in the United States, stating that program diversity increased after relaxation of the ownership rule, although the market concentration did also.…”
Section: Main Study Study Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%