Medial Column Arthrodesis Using an Anatomic Distal Fibular Locking Plate

Nasser, Ellianne M.; LaPorta, Guido A.; Trott, Kasandra

doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2014.05.004

Cited by 9 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The evolution of locked plates may enable medial placement of a plate instead of the plantar placement; however, a bulky construct can be a problem by increasing tension on the overlying skin. 15,31 Realignment and fixation with intramedullary devices has been reported, advocating less prominent hardware than plates. Cannulated screws have been shown to lack adequate mechanical strength, and breakage of up to 36% has been reported.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Midtarsal Reconstructive Arthrodesis Using a Multi-Axial Correction Fixator in Charcot Midfoot Arthropathy

Matsumoto

Parekh

2015

Foot & Ankle Specialist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Midtarsal Reconstructive Arthrodesis Using a Multi-Axial Correction Fixator in Charcot Midfoot Arthropathy

Matsumoto

Parekh

2015

Foot & Ankle Specialist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…At average follow-up of 38 months union was achieved in 24 of 25 feet and average time to ambulation was 11.68 weeks and the author concluded that the use of plantar plate provides sturdy construct for arthrodesis and ambulation. Nasser et al 62 described medial column fusion for various indications with anatomical distal fibular locking plates and stated that technique provides rigid fixation for at risk bone.…”

Section: Arthrodesis With Platesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Midfoot Charcot Arthropathy: Overview and Surgical Management

Rajasekaran¹,

Silvampatti²,

Nagaraja³

2016

Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery (Asia Pacific)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Midfoot Charcot arthropathy is a progressive deforming condition characterized by recurrent ulceration leading to high morbidity and amputation with lack of timely intervention. Nonoperative treatment is largely reserved for acute phase disease. Recent trend in management is early surgical interventions which could alter deforming forces and prevent deformity progression, as well as surgeries which provide osseously stable plantigrade foot. However, there are no clear-cut evidencebased guidelines regarding timing of interventions and method of techniques in surgical stabilization. This study discusses about surgical technique in the management of midfoot Charcot. How to cite this article Silvampatti S, Nagaraja HS, Rajasekaran S. Midfoot Charcot Arthropathy: Overview and Surgical Management. J Foot Ankle Surg (Asia-Pacific) 2016;3(2):97-106.

show abstract

“…Similarly, arthrodesis of the hindfoot (3)(4)(5)(6), midfoot (7,8), tarsometatarsal (9), and metatarsophalangeal (10) and triple arthrodesis of the talocalcaneal, talonavicular, and calcaneocuboid joints (11) can treat functional impairment and deformity secondary to Charcot arthropathy, trauma, degenerative joint disease, and rheumatoid arthritis (12). A variety of surgical techniques exist for achieving fusion of the joints in the foot and ankle, ranging from external fixator-assisted arthrodesis (13)(14)(15) to open arthrodesis (1,(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23) and arthroscopically assisted arthrodesis (24,25).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%