2022
DOI: 10.1007/s43465-022-00770-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction is Preferred to Repair or Reefing for First-Time Patellar Dislocation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This reason was supported by the finding that the strength of remnant ligaments is more weakened than autogenous or allogenous tendon grafts, even though they are repaired. [ 14 , 43 , 47 ] Additionally, the results of this meta-analysis showed that SUCRA percentage showed that MPFL reconstruction had a lower probability of re-dislocation than MPFL repair even though there was no significant difference between MPFL reconstruction and MPFL repair according to odds ratios values. In previous studies, CPR was thought to be one of the best treatments for treating patellar dislocation by strengthening the medial supporting structures and releasing the tight lateral supporting structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This reason was supported by the finding that the strength of remnant ligaments is more weakened than autogenous or allogenous tendon grafts, even though they are repaired. [ 14 , 43 , 47 ] Additionally, the results of this meta-analysis showed that SUCRA percentage showed that MPFL reconstruction had a lower probability of re-dislocation than MPFL repair even though there was no significant difference between MPFL reconstruction and MPFL repair according to odds ratios values. In previous studies, CPR was thought to be one of the best treatments for treating patellar dislocation by strengthening the medial supporting structures and releasing the tight lateral supporting structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This is likely why the senior author of the Letter to the Editor chose only to include the Kujala score in their systematic review comparing MPFLR versus repair. 4 While their study did evaluate complications, they found that less than a third of their included studies reported on this, thus highlighting the problem of a lack of reporting of outcomes in the MPFL literature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 10 , 11 , 12 Current treatment options include medial reefing, which has been reported to be 82% effective in avoiding recurrent dislocation but is nonanatomic in young individuals. 13 , 14 Lateral retinacular release may improve patellar stability but also significantly increases the incidence of patellar fracture because it compromises blood flow to the patella. 12 Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is an effective, standard operation for patellar stabilization after recurrent patellar instability but is more complicated in knees after arthroplasty.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%