2007
DOI: 10.1038/nn1890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medial prefrontal cell activity signaling prediction errors of action values

Abstract: To adapt behavior to a changing environment, one must monitor outcomes of executed actions and adjust subsequent actions accordingly. Involvement of the medial frontal cortex in performance monitoring has been suggested, but little is known about neural processes that link performance monitoring to performance adjustment. Here, we recorded from neurons in the medial prefrontal cortex of monkeys learning arbitrary action-outcome contingencies. Some cells preferentially responded to positive visual feedback stim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

53
316
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 403 publications
(375 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
53
316
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The pMFC was previously implicated into conflict detection (Botvinick et al, 2001), cognitive dissonance (van Veen et al, 2009;Izuma et al, 2010), volatility monitoring (Behrens et al, 2007), "goal-based action selection" (Matsumoto and Tanaka, 2004a,b), error likelihood prediction (Brown and Braver, 2005), and error processing (Holroyd and Coles, 2002;Ridderinkhof et al, 2004;Matsumoto et al, 2007). One possible explanation of our results is that TMS of the pMFC could be reducing cognitive/emotional dissonance evoked by conflicts with social norms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pMFC was previously implicated into conflict detection (Botvinick et al, 2001), cognitive dissonance (van Veen et al, 2009;Izuma et al, 2010), volatility monitoring (Behrens et al, 2007), "goal-based action selection" (Matsumoto and Tanaka, 2004a,b), error likelihood prediction (Brown and Braver, 2005), and error processing (Holroyd and Coles, 2002;Ridderinkhof et al, 2004;Matsumoto et al, 2007). One possible explanation of our results is that TMS of the pMFC could be reducing cognitive/emotional dissonance evoked by conflicts with social norms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…In humans, the pMFC is particularly responsive to performance errors in various tasks von Cramon, 2001, 2003;Gehring and Willoughby, 2002;Kerns et al, 2004). Neurons in the pMFC are probably involved in generating a "history of action" (Kennerley et al, 2006;Jocham et al, 2009b); distinct neuronal populations of the pMFC encode positive and negative prediction errors of action values (Matsumoto et al, 2007). Activity of the pMFC represents the direction of error in action-value prediction and varies as a function of the environmental context (Jocham et al, 2009a) to allow optimal adaptation to reversing reward contingencies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we sought to identify human brain regions resembling the ACC region in which neurons have been recorded that encode reward prediction errors (51,52) (Fig. 4C).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ACC plays a pivotal role in RL (Botvinick, 2007;Rushworth, 2008). It is thought to be implicated in the computation of reward expectations linked to actions or environmental stimuli, and calculate the difference between such expectations and the actual environmental outcomes (prediction error) (Amiez, Joseph, & Procyk, 2005;Jessup, Busemeyer, & Brown, 2010;Kennerley, Behrens, & Wallis, 2011;Matsumoto, Matsumoto, Abe, & Tanaka, 2007;Oliveira, McDonald, & Goodman, 2007). In ADHD patients, EEG studies have a diminished error related negativity (ERN) and error positivity (Pe) (Groen, et al, 2008;Herrmann, et al, 2010;Wiersema, van der Meere, & Roeyers, 2009).…”
Section: Acc Dysfunction In Adhdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second module simulates ACC itself. This module contains distinct neural units estimating reward expectations (V unit) (Amiez, et al, 2006;Kennerley, et al, 2011), and neural units coding for the difference between these expectations and actual environmental outcomes (prediction errors,  units) (Kennerley, et al, 2011;Matsumoto, et al, 2007). The ACC module estimates the reward expectations linked to each external event (stimulus or action), so that the activation of each of the two neurons coding for cues (C1, C2) is followed by the response of the V neuron.…”
Section: Model Structure and Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%