2016
DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2016.1128751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medical Ethics and School Football

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been growing concern about the long-term health consequences of playing American-style tackle football, driven in large part by high-profile suicides and case reports of chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) among former players [1], increased risks or neurodegenerative disease [2], and associations between concussion history and cognitive impairment and depression later in life [3][4][5]. These concerns have led some medical professionals [6][7][8] and policy makers [9] to propose limiting or banning youth tackle football. Careful estimation of the short-and long-term consequences of playing youth and adolescent football can help physicians better advise families weighing the benefits and risks of football participation [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been growing concern about the long-term health consequences of playing American-style tackle football, driven in large part by high-profile suicides and case reports of chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) among former players [1], increased risks or neurodegenerative disease [2], and associations between concussion history and cognitive impairment and depression later in life [3][4][5]. These concerns have led some medical professionals [6][7][8] and policy makers [9] to propose limiting or banning youth tackle football. Careful estimation of the short-and long-term consequences of playing youth and adolescent football can help physicians better advise families weighing the benefits and risks of football participation [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, sports physicians or team coaches need to reconcile conflicting needs of concussion risk minimization and athletic activity encouragement, which demands a balance approach to SRC risk management, such as through injury prevention protocols and legal liability limitations. 11 Thus, building on the positions of Corlett, Dixon and Sailors that examine both externalist and internalist perspectives concerning the ethical issue of SRCs in contact sports, López Frías and McNamee argue that an autonomy-based ethical examination of this issue undermines paternalist arguments for a reform or elimination of contact sports. 30,[32][33][34] Furthermore, according to López Frías and McNamee, the nature of the internal or external goods that contact sports players pursue in their athletic careers can be considered as a sufficient ethical basis to justify their acceptance of possible future health risks of various degrees related to on-field concussions and their long-term clinical consequences, which corresponds to the anti-paternalist ethical position.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10] Nevertheless, North American health professionals and medical ethicists have called for significantly reducing football programs in junior and high schools and nonschool settings, which together comprised approximately 4.1 students in 2015. 11 Previous clinical studies suggest the majority of concussion instances among children and adolescents are followed by rapid recoveries with only a minority of head injury patients suffering from ongoing post-concussion syndrome (PCS) symptoms. This paper will provide philosophical argument to strengthen the idea that preventive measures, identification protocols and management procedures in contact sports are needed rather than a paternalist prohibitive stance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 1 million high school students played American-style tackle football in 2014, but many medical professionals have recently begun questioning the safety of the sport (Bachynski, 2016;Pfister et al, 2016) or called for its outright ban (Miles and Prasad, 2016). Concern over the long-term safety of the sport have been driven partially by studies like Lehman et al (2012), which found an increased risk of neurodegenerative disease and Guskiewicz et al (2005Guskiewicz et al ( , 2007 and Hart Jr et al (2013), which highlighted associations between concussion history and later-life cognitive impairment and depression.…”
Section: Full Multivariate Analysis Of the Football Safety Datamentioning
confidence: 99%