1980
DOI: 10.1097/00001888-198009000-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medical student use of objectives in basic science and clinical instruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study suggest that while medical teachers still have some reservations about the use of objectives, these relate to inappropriate use of objectives by a small percentage of students. A recent study (Mast et al , 1980) suggests that these reservations are appropriate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of this study suggest that while medical teachers still have some reservations about the use of objectives, these relate to inappropriate use of objectives by a small percentage of students. A recent study (Mast et al , 1980) suggests that these reservations are appropriate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most research on instructional objectives has focused on the effects of the use of these objectives on student learning, retention and attitudes (Duchastel & Merrill, 1973; Hartley & Davies, 1976; Mast, et al , 1980; Melton, 1978). Little research has gone beyond the benefit to students and dealt with how faculty use objectives and how they feel about them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At most institutions, evaluating faculty-developed learning objectives is typically a small component of promotion criteria. Many faculty members question the value and effectiveness of student-generated feedback about objectives and suggest that objectives become less useful as students proceed from a preclinical to clinical curriculum [4]. Villanueva and Stewart [5] even suggest that students may be asked to evaluate faculty on the wrong criteria and that an evaluation should address what is useful after graduation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%