Medical Tourism: A Cost or Benefit to the NHS?

Abstract

‘Medical Tourism’ – the phenomenon of people travelling abroad to access medical treatment - has received increasing attention in academic and popular media. This paper reports findings from a study examining effect of inbound and outbound medical tourism on the UK NHS, by estimating volume of medical tourism and associated costs and benefits. A mixed methods study it includes analysis of the UK International Passenger Survey (IPS); interviews with 77 returning UK medical tourists, 63 policymakers, NHS managers and medical tourism industry actors policymakers, and a review of published literature. These informed costing of three types of treatments for which patients commonly travel abroad: fertility treatment, cosmetic and bariatric surgery. Costing of inbound tourism relied on data obtained through 28 Freedom-of-Information requests to NHS Foundation Trusts. Findings demonstrate that contrary to some popular media reports, far from being a net importer of patients, the UK is now a clear net exporter of medical travellers. In 2010, an estimated 63,000 UK residents travelled for treatment, while around 52,000 patients sought treatment in the UK. Inbound medical tourists treated as private patients within NHS facilities may be especially profitable when compared to UK private patients, yielding close to a quarter of revenue from only 7% of volume in the data examined. Costs arise where patients travel abroad and return with complications. Analysis also indicates possible savings especially in future health care and social costs averted. These are likely to be specific to procedures and conditions treated. UK medical tourism is a growing phenomenon that presents risks and opportunities to the NHS. To fully understand its implications and guide policy on issues such as NHS global activities and patient safety will require investment in further research and monitoring. Results point to likely impact of medical tourism in other universal public health systems.

Trends and structural shifts in health tourism: Evidence from seasonal time-series data on health-related travel spending by Canada during 1970–2010

“…For countries on the demand side of health services abroad (with outbound patients), health tourism provides a way to relieve the shortage of health services in the domestic market. The increasing volume of health tourism activities, however, often yields growing concerns about patient safety and legal issues related to malpractice, given that the legal responsibility has not always been clearly defined between patients, health insurance agencies, and foreign health service providers Hanefeld et al, 2013;Mitka, 2009;Samir and Karim, 2011;Turner, 2010). International medical travel can also influence domestic political and social changes (Ormond, 2015).…”

Spectrum of neurosurgical complications following medical tourism: challenges of patients without borders

“…In 2010, an estimated 63,000 UK residents travelled for treatment, while around 52,000 patients sought treatment in the UK 14 . However in Nigeria, there is no reliable data on patient numbers, flows, treatment types and success rates.…”

National Health Service Principles as Experienced by Vulnerable London Migrants in "Austerity Britain": A Qualitative Study of Rights, Entitlements, and Civil-Society Advocacy

“…37,38 Hanefeld and colleagues used the Office of National Statistics IPS dataset 2000-2010 to show that inbound travel of foreign patients has remained constant, with a substantial increase in UK residents travelling abroad for medical treatment. 37 Similarly, doctors of the world (DoW) service-user data shows most have lived in the United The response gives details of the responses received and sets out: how the proposed immigration health surcharge will work and proposed changes to the 'ordinary residence test.' It also gives detailed responses to issues raised and summarises the feedback that was received from organisations and individuals.…”