Medieval Pottery at Rouen

Barton, K. J.

doi:10.1080/00665983.1965.11077363

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…All the descriptive parameters of groups Gl and G2 correspond to what we know of pottery from Rouen and Paris found on French sites. The classic studies of K J Barton (1965;J Nicourt (1986) are still useful. The large number of sherds found by Nicole and Olivier Meyer on the pottery production sites at Saint-Denis, near Paris, provide further invaluable references (Meyer et al 1979;.…”

Section: Groups Gl and G2 (Figs 3 And 4)mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Bryggen Papers. Supplementary Series. No 5

1994

The Bryggen Papers

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Part 1. The Background to the Study (Lyn Blackmore and Alan Vince) 9 1 Introduction: the aims of the project 13 Acknowledgements 15 2 The archaeological background 16 2.1 The development of urban archaeology in Norway 16 2.2 Medieval archaeology in Bergen 17 2.3 The Bryggen excavation 21 2.3.1 The 1955 fire 21 2.3.2 The recording system 24 2.3.3 Site chronology 24 2.3.4 The distribution of the finds 26 3 The background to the ceramic study 31 3.1 Medieval pottery from Bryggen 31 3.2 Chronological trends in the Bryggen pottery 31 3.3 English pottery from Bryggen 32 3.4 The London medieval pottery sequence 33 Part 2. The Analysis (Lyn Blackmore and Man Vince) 43 4 Methodology 45 4.1 The initial data 45 4.2.1 Recording and terminology 45 4.2.2 Shelly-Sandy ware 46 4.2.3 London-type ware 46 4.2.4 Sherd links 46 4.2.5 Condition 46 4.3 Constraints 47 5.3.3 Cooking pot vessel profiles 53 5.3.4 Cooking pot base forms 54 5.3.5 Cooking pot manufacture 54 5.3.6 Cooking pot decoration 55 5.3.7 The pipkin 55 5.4 Evidence of use 56 5.5 Condition 56 6 London-type ware and Coarse London-type ware 59 6.1 Fabric 59 6.2 Firing 60 6.3 Manufacture, slips and glazes 61 6.4 Forms and decoration 61 6.4.1 Jugs 62 6.4.2 Early-style jugs 63 6.4.3 Rouen-style and North French-style jugs 64 6.4.4 Later jug forms 65 6.4.5 Other vessel types 66 6.5 Evidence of use 67 6.6 Condition 68 7 The distribution of London-type ware on the Bryggen 69 7.1 Shelly Sandy ware 69 7.1.1 The general distribution, by Period 69 7.1.2 The distribution of joining sherds of Shelly-Sandy ware 73 7.1.3 The distribution of vessels showing no evidence of use 73 7.1.4 The distribution of sherds with unusual deposits 74 7.1.5 The distribution of leached and unleached vessels 75 7.2 London-type ware 75 7.2.1 The general distribution, by Period 75 7.2.2 The distribution of joining sherds of London-type ware 81 8 Kingston-type ware 84 8.1 Fabric 84 8.2 Forms, decoration and dating 84 9 Mill Green-type ware 86 9.1 Fabric 86 9.2 Forms, decoration and dating 86 14 Pottery as an indicator of trade 112 14.1 The London-area pottery from Bergen 112 14.1.1 The London-area pottery from Southern Norway 112 14.2 Discussion 113 Part 4: Conclusions (Lyn Blackmore and Alan Vince) 117 15 Conclusions 118 Appendix 1. Catalogue of the illustrated Shelly-Sandy wares 122 Appendix 2. Catalogue of the illustrated London-type wares 126 Appendix 3.

show abstract

Section: Groups Gl and G2 (Figs 3 And 4)mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Bryggen Papers. Supplementary Series. No 5

1994

The Bryggen Papers

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The term "Rouen-type ware" is used here for vessels manufactured in white or light-firing clay with clear lead glaze and polychrome decoration produced using white and red-firing clays. Such vessels are best known in the English-speaking world through the publication of vessels in the Rouen museum collection by Barton (1966) and Southampton (Platt & Coleman-Smith 1975, 23-7, 132-47). There is a clear division of these vessels into two groups which differ in typology, decoration and date.…”

Section: Fig 150 Islamic Glazed Scale 1:4 Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Corpus of Anglo-Saxon and Medieval Pottery from Lincoln

Young¹,

Vince²,

Nailor³

2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

character of the archaeological deposits excavated within the city. An exception, the 17th and 18thcentury filling of the well at St Paul-in-the-Bail, is the subject of a separate report. Summaryby O'Neill as cinerary vessels found in a 'Roman crematorium' (O'Neill, 1885).Discoveries from excavation in the modern sense started with Graham Webster's excavation at Flaxengate between 1945 and 1947(Coppack, 1973. Here for the first time stratified medieval deposits were excavated and recorded in a scientific manner, subsequently providing Glyn Coppack with the material to construct the first medieval pottery sequence for the city (ibid). Although in the light of more recent work the exact dating of this material Adams Gilmour as a permanent Medieval Pottery Researcher to work on material from the numerous excavations carried out by the then Lincoln Archaeological Trust added a new impetus to pottery studies. Major innovative work carried out by Dr. Adams Gilmour on material from sites at Broadgate (Adams, 1977) and Flaxengate (Adams Gilmour, 1988) 7 Methodology or slipped decoration and other non-standard conventions are shown in Fig. 4.

show abstract