S ince the beginning of the #metoo movement about 2 years ago, medicine and health care are facing their own moment of reckoning. This should not come as a surprise. Sexual harassment is a pervasive phenomenon that can affect all areas of work, 1 yet the field of medicine displays some peculiar risks. As physicians we have to invade our patients' privacy verbally and physically on a daily basis, just to do our job. However, this is only a small part of the problem. Historically, the practice of medicine was associated with a work culture that praised relentless drive and expected unlimited competence and infallibility. The ones that believed to have achieved this heroic status frequently also felt entitled to immunity and impunity. This applied 25 years ago, when the Lancet published an editorial addressing the ''professional disgrace'' of harassment 2 and is often still true today. This is the larger part of the problem. In a context of perfectionism and endurance, the human dimension of work was often ignored, as if social relations were a by-product of work and not an essential grounding aspect of it. The problem was framed according to three misconceptions. First, harassment was judged a minority issue affecting a few overly sensitive women unfit for the job. Second, if harassment was indeed identified, the perpetrators had to be a few ''rotten apples'' within the organization. Third, harassment was not supposed to cause any physical or psychological harm and, as such, had no priority. All three of these assumptions are false as the article by Vargas et al. published in this issue 3 of the journal once again demonstrates. The authors report on a faculty-wide survey at University of Michigan Medical School in which participants recounted their experiences with sexual harassment in the workplace. The first assumption is that only a small number of women are affected. Emerging data, as the one Vargas et al. 3 are reporting in this issue, are contradicting the long-held belief that sexual harassment is a niche problem. Many former studies, including the recent landmark report by the National Academies, 4 solely concentrated on women as victims. Although women are more frequently affected, limiting a study to their experiences does not allow grasping the magnitude of the problem. Vargas reports that 60%-80% of the workforce-female and male-has experienced some incident in the past 12 months. This is in line with our own data from Germany, 5 which also showed significant rates of harassment among men. Hence, we are not addressing a niche