2017
DOI: 10.1177/0148558x17742568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meeting Earnings Benchmarks via Real Activities Manipulation: Debt Market Effects

Abstract: We investigate the cost of debt effects for firms that manage earnings per share (EPS) through abnormal share repurchases. Although prior research finds a significant cost of debt decrease for firms that meet earnings benchmarks, our results suggest that firms using the abnormal share repurchase strategy realize no cost of debt decrease associated with meeting earnings benchmarks. We find some evidence of a smaller decrease in cost of debt associated with measures of abnormal decreases in cash flows but weak e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Real activities earnings management is defined as management actions that deviate from normal business practices and are undertaken for purposes of meeting certain earnings i.e., a deviation from companies' normal operational activities (Roychowdhury, 2006). Following recent researchers, this study also uses Roychowdhury's model which comprises four measures to detect real activities earnings management (e.g., Amoah, Anderson, Bonaparte, & Muzorewa, 2017;Hinkel & Hoffman, 2017;Wardhani & Anggraenni, 2017). They are: (i) operating cash flows, (ii) production costs, (iii) expenses, and (iv) combined measures of real activities manipulation (refer Appendix B for details).…”
Section: Roychowdhury's Model (Real Activities Earnings Management)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Real activities earnings management is defined as management actions that deviate from normal business practices and are undertaken for purposes of meeting certain earnings i.e., a deviation from companies' normal operational activities (Roychowdhury, 2006). Following recent researchers, this study also uses Roychowdhury's model which comprises four measures to detect real activities earnings management (e.g., Amoah, Anderson, Bonaparte, & Muzorewa, 2017;Hinkel & Hoffman, 2017;Wardhani & Anggraenni, 2017). They are: (i) operating cash flows, (ii) production costs, (iii) expenses, and (iv) combined measures of real activities manipulation (refer Appendix B for details).…”
Section: Roychowdhury's Model (Real Activities Earnings Management)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such an approach is still adopted to prevent earnings from falling below the expected thresholds and generating negative investor feedback. Hinkel and Hoffman (2020) show that firms that use the share repurchase strategy to meet earnings benchmarks lead to smaller reductions in the cost of debt. Fogel-Yaari and Ronen (2020) show that meeting or beating expectations/thresholds is good news because it signals that the firm will also meet or beat expectations in the future and explains the richness of the menu of reporting strategies ("taking a bath," "cookie-jar reserves," or marginal threshold beating).…”
Section: The Signaling Theory On Earnings Thresholdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investors and creditors value performance. Therefore, enterprise managers experience earnings pressure and may manipulate earnings through business activities (Phan et al, 2017;Jeong & Choi, 2019;Kałdoński & Jewartowski, 2020;Liu et al, 2021) to avoid earnings decreases (Byun & Roland, 2022) or to meet analysts' earnings forecasts (Gastón & Jarne, 2021), or engage in earnings management such as avoiding earnings losses (Hinkel & Hoffman, 2020). Bartov et al (2002) and Brown and Caylor (2005) demonstrate that managers tend to manipulate earnings to meet a specific threshold and prevent negative investor feedback from decreasing share prices, which provides a signal of future growth to outsiders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%