2017
DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meeting the challenge of DNA barcoding Neotropical amphibians: polymerase chain reaction optimization and new COI primers

Abstract: Amphibians are one of the most threatened vertebrate classes, yet at the same time new species are being described every year, demonstrating that the number of existing species is grossly underestimated. In groups such as amphibians, with high extinction rates and poorly known species boundaries, DNA barcoding is a tool that can rapidly assess genetic diversity and estimate species richness for prioritizing conservation decisions. However, reliable recovery of the 5' region of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
75
1
16

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
2
75
1
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite awareness that RNA-seq data contain high numbers of mt genome reads (Smith, 2013), the majority of available methods for mt genome assembly are customized for recovering these from genome sequencing projects (either whole genome sequencing or genome skimming). Nevertheless, the mining of mt genomes from RNA-seq data has been successfully performed in a handful of eukaryotes, including algae (Tian & Smith, 2016), reptiles (Lyra, Haddad, & Azeredo-Espin, 2017), sea urchins (Dilly, Gaitán-Espitia, & Hofmann, 2015) and bony fishes (Moreira, Furtado, & Parente, 2015), yet using disparate software approaches, including Bowtie2/ Trinity, Trinity assembly, MIRA version 4.0/MITObim version 1.8 (Lyra et al, 2017), and blasting against the mt genomes of closely related species (Dilly et al, 2015). In the case of incomplete mt genome recovery from transcriptomic data, gaps were filled by combining with the genomic data (Nan Song, An, & Yin, x., Cai, w., Li, H., 2016;Fabre, Jønsson, & Douzery, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite awareness that RNA-seq data contain high numbers of mt genome reads (Smith, 2013), the majority of available methods for mt genome assembly are customized for recovering these from genome sequencing projects (either whole genome sequencing or genome skimming). Nevertheless, the mining of mt genomes from RNA-seq data has been successfully performed in a handful of eukaryotes, including algae (Tian & Smith, 2016), reptiles (Lyra, Haddad, & Azeredo-Espin, 2017), sea urchins (Dilly, Gaitán-Espitia, & Hofmann, 2015) and bony fishes (Moreira, Furtado, & Parente, 2015), yet using disparate software approaches, including Bowtie2/ Trinity, Trinity assembly, MIRA version 4.0/MITObim version 1.8 (Lyra et al, 2017), and blasting against the mt genomes of closely related species (Dilly et al, 2015). In the case of incomplete mt genome recovery from transcriptomic data, gaps were filled by combining with the genomic data (Nan Song, An, & Yin, x., Cai, w., Li, H., 2016;Fabre, Jønsson, & Douzery, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We amplified and sequenced two mitochondrial (16S ribosomal RNA gene (16S), cytochrome oxidase c subunit I (COI)) and two nuclear (brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene (BDNF), cellular myelocytomatosis gene (C-myc)) gene fragments for all analyzed specimens. DNA fragments were amplified by standard PCR technique using the primers listed in Table S2 -Electronic supplementary material (Crawford 2003;Lyra et al 2016;Palumbi et al 1991;Van der Meijden et al 2007;Wiens et al 2005). PCR products were purified via enzymatic reaction and sequenced with the BigDye™ terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit v3.1 (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) in an automatic Sequencer 3730XL by Macrogen Inc., Seoul, South Korea.…”
Section: Dna Sequences Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For newly generated sequences, genomic DNA was extracted from ethanol-preserved mus¬ cle tissue using standard ammonium acetate extraction protocol adapted from Maniatis et al (1982). Primers employed for amplification (COI gene) and PCR enzymatic reaction conditions follow those of Lyra et al (2017), and the resulting amplified fragments were sequenced by Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, South Korea). Chromatograms were checked manually, assembled, and edited using Geneious v. 7 (Biomatters Ltd.).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%