1961
DOI: 10.1139/g61-009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MEIOTIC DRIVE IN NATURAL POPULATIONS OFDROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. VIII. A HERITABLE AGING EFFECT ON THE PHENOMENON OF SEGREGATION-DISTORTION

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
75
0
1

Year Published

1976
1976
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
75
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3 This chromosome causes very weak distortion, with k values around 0.58 (see Tables 2 and 5). Addition of the Sd gene via the P[(w + Sd) 2 ] transgene 7 to the SD-5 r7 chromosome results in a k value of 1.000 (Table 2, line 4). Addition of a mutation that affects nuclear transport should cause similar increases in distortion if a defect in nuclear transport is responsible for the distortion phenotype.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 This chromosome causes very weak distortion, with k values around 0.58 (see Tables 2 and 5). Addition of the Sd gene via the P[(w + Sd) 2 ] transgene 7 to the SD-5 r7 chromosome results in a k value of 1.000 (Table 2, line 4). Addition of a mutation that affects nuclear transport should cause similar increases in distortion if a defect in nuclear transport is responsible for the distortion phenotype.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SD was first observed because males carrying one SD chromosome and one normal (SD + ) chromosome failed to transmit the normal chromosome to their offspring, causing transmission ratios of near 100% of the SD chromosome. 2 The SD system has been well-studied at both the genetic 1,3,4 and molecular levels. [5][6][7] SD consists of a collection of genes, all of which reside on the 2 nd chromosome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Drosophila melanogaster complex, only a small number of genes involved in intragenomic conflict have been identified within natural populations (e.g., Sandler et al 1959;Mercot et al 1995). While this may suggest that intragenomic conflict is a relatively rare event, it needs to be considered that there is a strong ascertainment bias: The rapid spread of driver alleles is either prevented by a quick fixation of suppressor alleles, or, in case of sex chromosome-linked segregation distorters, populations with an advanced intragenomic conflict become extinct (Gershenson 1928;Hamilton 1967;Lyttle 1977).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-Mendelian segregation of markers, known as distorted segregation, is a common biological phenomenon and has been reported since the early twentieth century (Mangelsdorf and Jones, 1926;Sandler et al, 1959;Rick, 1966;McCouch et al, 1988;Paterson et al, 1988;Brummer et al, 1993;Xu et al, 1997;Kaló et al, 2000;Lu et al, 2002;Barchi et al, 2010). It may lead to a biased estimate of the recombination fraction and affect the accuracy of linkage groups (Lorieux et al, 1995a,b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%