1995
DOI: 10.2307/3889275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Melikane and Upper Mangolong Revisited: The Possible Effects on San Art of Symbiotic Contact between South-Eastern San and Southern Sotho and Nguni Communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Blundell (2004: 73) observes that 'the nature of interaction between San and Bantu speakers' varied greatly in different areas and across time, a point borne out in the discussion of the rock art outlined in the previous paragraph which suggests that a continuum of contact possibilities and types existed in the Drakensberg-Maloti and Nomansland. These include a high level of cultural subordination to the Bantu (Jolly 1995), creolisation and multi-ethnicity (Mallen 2008;Challis 2009) as well as co-habitation, but with a clear division of identity and culture (Blundell 2004), a situation that probably also prevailed in parts of the Free State (Klatzow 2010) and which also, to some extent, describes the position of Qing and his wives among the BaPhuthi. Gavin Whitelaw, drawing on archaeological, ethnographic, and 19 th -century testimonies from Nguni informants, argues that the general pattern of interaction between Nguni and San over the centuries was one that involved both cooperation and difference and subordination, with the ambiguous positioning of the San between nature and culture (2009: 143) making them sought after as diviners and rainmakers.…”
Section: War Contact and Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blundell (2004: 73) observes that 'the nature of interaction between San and Bantu speakers' varied greatly in different areas and across time, a point borne out in the discussion of the rock art outlined in the previous paragraph which suggests that a continuum of contact possibilities and types existed in the Drakensberg-Maloti and Nomansland. These include a high level of cultural subordination to the Bantu (Jolly 1995), creolisation and multi-ethnicity (Mallen 2008;Challis 2009) as well as co-habitation, but with a clear division of identity and culture (Blundell 2004), a situation that probably also prevailed in parts of the Free State (Klatzow 2010) and which also, to some extent, describes the position of Qing and his wives among the BaPhuthi. Gavin Whitelaw, drawing on archaeological, ethnographic, and 19 th -century testimonies from Nguni informants, argues that the general pattern of interaction between Nguni and San over the centuries was one that involved both cooperation and difference and subordination, with the ambiguous positioning of the San between nature and culture (2009: 143) making them sought after as diviners and rainmakers.…”
Section: War Contact and Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moving beyond the tendency of positivist archaeology to sanction conceptions of culture and identity as fixed entities (Shepherd 2003b), archaeologists explored changing identities of hunter-gatherers and herders in the past (e.g. Parkington 1984;Jolly 1995), the role of ethnographic analogy in archaeology (e.g. J. Deacon 1986; Lewis-Williams and Dowson 1989), and the negotiation of power and gender in past social relations (e.g.…”
Section: Historical Perspectives From Settler Colony To Apartheid Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pieter Jolly (1994Jolly ( , 1995Jolly ( , 1996Jolly ( , 2006 has taken a rather different approach to the interpretation of contact period art in the Maloti-Drakensberg area. He has used historical records and oral traditions to emphasise the symbiotic nature of the relationship between San, Sotho and Nguni groups across a large part of the eastern Free State, Eastern Cape and Lesotho.…”
Section: Moving Beyond Overarching Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%