1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0248(96)00802-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Melt convection effects on the critical velocity of particle engulfment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The di!erent symbols correspond to the following particle materials in water: (a) copper with G+10 K m\ [19], the best-"t line has a slope of !0.9; (b) copper with G+10 K m\ [19], slope !1.2; (c) tungsten with G+10 K m\ [19], slope !0.4; (d) latex with G+10 K m\ [20], slope !1.0; (e) latex with G+4; 10 K m\ [21], slope !0.6; (f) latex with G+1.8; 10 K m\ [22], slope !0.9; (g) nylon with G+200 K m\ [23], slope !1.1. The upward pointing triangles correspond to polystyrene particles in a succinonitrile melt with G+10 K m\ and a slope of !1.0 [24]. The slope of the line through data set (h), for silicon carbide particles in a succinonitrile melt, is !0.9 [1].…”
Section: Particle Velocitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The di!erent symbols correspond to the following particle materials in water: (a) copper with G+10 K m\ [19], the best-"t line has a slope of !0.9; (b) copper with G+10 K m\ [19], slope !1.2; (c) tungsten with G+10 K m\ [19], slope !0.4; (d) latex with G+10 K m\ [20], slope !1.0; (e) latex with G+4; 10 K m\ [21], slope !0.6; (f) latex with G+1.8; 10 K m\ [22], slope !0.9; (g) nylon with G+200 K m\ [23], slope !1.1. The upward pointing triangles correspond to polystyrene particles in a succinonitrile melt with G+10 K m\ and a slope of !1.0 [24]. The slope of the line through data set (h), for silicon carbide particles in a succinonitrile melt, is !0.9 [1].…”
Section: Particle Velocitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…By contrast, when smaller particles interacted with ice grown at lower solidification rates, particles were pushed ahead of the interface and remained nearly surrounded by the bulk liquid. Subsequent efforts to explain these phenomena have been driven by their importance to solidification dynamics in industrial and biological processes in addition to ground freezing phenomena ͑Uhlmann et Hoekstra and Miller, 1967;Bolling and Cissé, 1971;Omenyi and Neumann, 1976;Gilpin, 1980c;Bronshtein et al, 1981;Pötschke and Rogge, 1989;Azouni et al, 1990Azouni et al, , 1997Shangguan et al, 1992;Asthana and Tewari, 1993;Lipp and Körber, 1993;Sen et al, 1997͒. A comprehensive description of the underlying mechanisms was first given by Chernov and his colleagues ͑Chernov and Mel 'nikova, 1966;Chernov and Temkin, 1977͒, and has since been generalized and placed within the context of our modern understanding of premelting behavior ͑Dash, 1989b; Rempel andWorster, 1999, 2001͒. Intermolecular forces that act between the particle, ice, and liquid generate a premelted film and produce a net thermomolecular force that disjoins the particle from the ice surface.…”
Section: Frost Heavementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their behavior could be analyzed mainly on the basis of low melting temperature model liquids. Numerous authors performed simulations and experiments on the behavior of non-metallic particles during the process taking place in CCS [1][2][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. A CCD [4] or digital camera, or a laser microscope was used for experimental analyses of the particle/ front interaction [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%