2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00410-019-1563-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Melt segregation and the architecture of magmatic reservoirs: insights from the Muroto sill (Japan)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that magmas typically reach the rigid percolation threshold at about 50 vol% crystallinity 18,[40][41][42] , we consider all magma below this threshold to be potentially extractable. Furthermore, we assume that interstitial liquids of magmas with more than 50 vol% crystals are potentially extractable by melt segregation or by mixing/mingling processes during disruption of highly crystallized crystal mushed associated with recharge [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] . Probabilities of melt extraction may significantly decrease in magma bodies with > 75% crystal content 41 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that magmas typically reach the rigid percolation threshold at about 50 vol% crystallinity 18,[40][41][42] , we consider all magma below this threshold to be potentially extractable. Furthermore, we assume that interstitial liquids of magmas with more than 50 vol% crystals are potentially extractable by melt segregation or by mixing/mingling processes during disruption of highly crystallized crystal mushed associated with recharge [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] . Probabilities of melt extraction may significantly decrease in magma bodies with > 75% crystal content 41 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent hypotheses for the emplacement of magmas in small volume sub-volcanic environments have proposed that large continuously fractionating magma chambers do not exist (Emeleus & Troll, 2014;Floess et al 2019;Hepworth et al 2020;Savard & Mitchell, 2021). Following these concepts, the mineralogical variations of the Type 1-3 lavas can be explained by fractional crystallization of many individual batches of magmas derived from a common source coupled with magma mixing as a result of intrusion of magma into crystal-melt mushes and/or entrainment of crystals derived from disaggregation of pre-existing fully crystallized melts; i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Segregations of FeS were sucked from the sample into polycrystalline alumina pistons to form alignments of connected melt pockets driven by reductions in pore fluid pressure associated with dilatancy (see Petford et al 2007;Fonseca et al 2013, and supplementary materials Figs. 7-9) Bachmann and Huber 2018;Floess et al 2019). Attempts to explain crystal mush reactivation in silicic systems via an interplay of melting and gas addition (Huber et al 2011), strike us as unnecessarily complex.…”
Section: Dilatancy In Crustal Melt Columns: Turbo-charging the Segregmentioning
confidence: 99%