2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.162029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Melting and phase diagram of Au-Cu alloy at nanoscale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the calculated solidus temperature for nanoparticles with a diameter of 10 nm is greater than those achieved from experiments [14]. When comparing the experimental results with those achieved from computations, it should be noted that the experimental results are actually related to a set of nanoparticles with a size distribution of 7 to 14 nanometers [14], so, a difference in results between experimental data and those of modeling is expected.…”
Section: Figure 2 Calculated Surface Contribution Of the Gibbs Free E...mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, the calculated solidus temperature for nanoparticles with a diameter of 10 nm is greater than those achieved from experiments [14]. When comparing the experimental results with those achieved from computations, it should be noted that the experimental results are actually related to a set of nanoparticles with a size distribution of 7 to 14 nanometers [14], so, a difference in results between experimental data and those of modeling is expected.…”
Section: Figure 2 Calculated Surface Contribution Of the Gibbs Free E...mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In addition, the calculated solidus temperature for nanoparticles with a diameter of 10 nm is greater than those achieved from experiments [14]. When comparing the experimental results with those achieved from computations, it should be noted that the experimental results are actually related to a set of nanoparticles with a size distribution of 7 to 14 nanometers [14], so, a difference in results between experimental data and those of modeling is expected. In addition, it should be brought to attention that the CALPHAD method is a semi-empirical technique, and the use of appropriate experimental data is essential to be able to optimize the model parameters and computational accuracy.…”
Section: Figure 2 Calculated Surface Contribution Of the Gibbs Free E...mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations