1959
DOI: 10.1038/1831612a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Melting Point and Sublimation of Molybdenum Disulphide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, it reaches its estimated melting point at 0.02 to 0.03 seconds after ignition. The melting point of MoS 2 is uncertain, being reported as 1923 K to 1973 K by Zelikman and Belayaeskaya, [17] whereas Cannon [18] measured approximately 2073 K. After being corrected by applying Tammann's rule, this temperature is measured at 2646 K. These values, however, do not agree with the experimental results, which in the partially reacted samples collected no evidence of melting or cenosphere formation was found. One possible explanation for this [19] and Zelikman and Belayaeskaya [17] found that at 1923 K to 1973 K molybdenite melts with simultaneous decomposition to molybdenum sesquisulfide (Mo 2 S 3 ) generating gaseous sulfur according to:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…In addition, it reaches its estimated melting point at 0.02 to 0.03 seconds after ignition. The melting point of MoS 2 is uncertain, being reported as 1923 K to 1973 K by Zelikman and Belayaeskaya, [17] whereas Cannon [18] measured approximately 2073 K. After being corrected by applying Tammann's rule, this temperature is measured at 2646 K. These values, however, do not agree with the experimental results, which in the partially reacted samples collected no evidence of melting or cenosphere formation was found. One possible explanation for this [19] and Zelikman and Belayaeskaya [17] found that at 1923 K to 1973 K molybdenite melts with simultaneous decomposition to molybdenum sesquisulfide (Mo 2 S 3 ) generating gaseous sulfur according to:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…The low oxygen partial pressure in our vacuum chamber allows the MoS 2 to reach such high temperatures without oxidation. Reports on the melting point of monolayer MoS 2 are lacking, but melting of bulk material was found to arise at temperatures >1923 K. Our measurements are well described by Planck's law, even though the small size of the emission spot ( d rad < hc / E 0 ) places it outside the thermodynamic limit regime . From a practical point of view, our results are also important with regard to the miniaturization of TMD‐based electronic devices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…For simplicity, our effective material model adopts temperatureindependent mechanical properties (density ρ, Young's modulus E, yield stress σ yield , and critical strain crit ) equivalent to those of thin-film polycrystalline MoS 2 at 300 K [35][36][37], and also uses the ultra-high vacuum sublimation temperature of bulk MoS 2 T sub ≈ 1000 K [38,39] as the thermal limit. For the effective optical properties, we use a 90%/10% weighted average of the room-temperature complex index of refraction values (n and κ) of MoS 2 [40] and Al 2 O 3 [41,42], respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To aid this discussion, we have plotted twelve relevant quantities, including m s , t f , P max , T max , σ max , L, a , α a , ε e , and three others that we will introduce below, as a function of d s and s s in Figure 3 for a m tot = 2 g sailcraft accelerated by a constant laser output power of Φ 0 = 30 GW (see Supplementary Information). In these panels, as labeled in Figure 3(a), we have removed designs for which the curvature would result in multiple reflections and cause excessive heating in the cen-ter of the sail s s < ds √ 2 , designs hot enough to sublimate the material, T max > T sub ≈ 1000 K [38,39], and designs that would tear, σ max > σ yield ≈ 1000 MPa [36,37]. Importantly at low diameters d s , few persisting light sail designs exhibit large radii of curvature s s , which underscores the the imperative that light sails should be curved (higher s s values imply flatter structures).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%