Lung transplantation is the only definitive therapy for many forms of end-stage lung diseases. However, the success of lung transplantation is limited by many factors: (1 ) Too few lungs available for transplantation due to limited donors or injury to the donor lung; (2 ) current methods of preservation of excised lungs do not allow extended periods of time between procurement and implantation; (3 ) acute graft failure is more common with lungs than other solid organs, thus contributing to poorer short-term survival after lung transplant compared with that for recipients of other organs; (4 ) lung transplant recipients are particularly vulnerable to pulmonary infections; and (5 ) chronic allograft dysfunction, manifest by bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, is frequent and limits long-term survival. Scientific advances may provide significant improvements in the outcome of lung transplantation. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute convened a working group of investigators on June 14-15, 2004, in Bethesda, Maryland, to identify opportunities for scientific advancement in lung transplantation, including basic and clinical research. This workshop provides a framework to identify critical issues related to clinical lung transplantation, and to delineate important areas for productive scientific investigation.
Keywords: allograft dysfunction; infection; ischemia-reperfusion injury; lung transplantation; obliterative bronchiolitis; rejectionThe transplantation of organs offers the promise of life-saving and life-enhancing therapy for a variety of ailments. Lung transplantation (LTx) has become an acceptable therapy to palliate patients with a variety of end-stage lung diseases. However, lung transplantation has not turned out to be a panacea for chronic lung disease because of significant limitations in the entire transplant process (Figure 1). First, there are not nearly enough suitable donor lungs to meet the needs of all patients with end-stage lung disease. As a result, more patients die waiting for transplants than from mortality associated with a lung transplant. Second, early graft survival after LTx is worse than for other types of organs transplanted (1). Finally, late survival after successful LTx is hampered by the development of chronic allograft dysfunction and by the life-limiting complications associated with conventional immunosuppressive medications. Two factors impede progress to address these problems: (1 ) lung transplant centers lack the infrastructure to facilitate prospective, multicenter clinical studies of sufficient power to address clinical questions and (2 ) there are too few investigators studying the biology of lung transplantation.The NHLBI convened a workshop on June 14-15, 2004, to better understand these complex problems and to identify strategies to address these and prioritize them. The topics addressed by participants were wide-ranging. They included the following: lung use rates from conventional brain-dead organ donors; safe limits for donor lung function; consideration o...