2019
DOI: 10.3390/polym11071089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Membrane-Based Clarification and Fractionation of Red Wine Lees Aqueous Extracts

Abstract: Polyvinylidenefluoride (PVDF) hollow fiber membranes prepared in laboratory through the inversion phase method were characterized and used to clarify an aqueous extract from red wine lees. Steady-state permeate fluxes of 53 kg/m2h were obtained in the treatment of the aqueous extract in selected operating conditions. Suspended solids were completely retained by the hollow fiber membranes while bioactive compounds, including polyphenols, anthocyanins, and resveratrol were recovered in the permeate stream. The c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Membrane separation processes can be used at large scale, with three main objectives: (i) to remove suspended and colloidal matter in the extraction stage by using pressuredriven membrane techniques as microfiltration (MF 0.1-5 µm, 1-10 bar) and/or ultrafiltration (UF 0.5-100 nm, 1-10 bar); (ii) to selectively separate polyphenols from other families of compounds co-extracted in the extraction (e.g., sugars, proteins, lipids) by using pressure-driven membrane techniques as ultrafiltration (UF) and/or nanofiltration (NF) and; (iii) to reduce the volume of the polyphenols rich streams by using pressure-driven membrane techniques as nanofiltration (NF 5-10 nm, 10-30 bar) and/or reverse osmosis (RO < 0.5 nm, 35-100 bar) [20,[105][106][107][108][109][110][111][112][113].…”
Section: Conditioning Of Polyphenol Extracts: From Particulate Matter...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Membrane separation processes can be used at large scale, with three main objectives: (i) to remove suspended and colloidal matter in the extraction stage by using pressuredriven membrane techniques as microfiltration (MF 0.1-5 µm, 1-10 bar) and/or ultrafiltration (UF 0.5-100 nm, 1-10 bar); (ii) to selectively separate polyphenols from other families of compounds co-extracted in the extraction (e.g., sugars, proteins, lipids) by using pressure-driven membrane techniques as ultrafiltration (UF) and/or nanofiltration (NF) and; (iii) to reduce the volume of the polyphenols rich streams by using pressure-driven membrane techniques as nanofiltration (NF 5-10 nm, 10-30 bar) and/or reverse osmosis (RO < 0.5 nm, 35-100 bar) [20,[105][106][107][108][109][110][111][112][113].…”
Section: Conditioning Of Polyphenol Extracts: From Particulate Matter...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They include pressurized liquid extraction [17], sub and supercritical extraction [18], ultrasound-assisted extraction [19], microwave-assisted extraction [20] and membrane processing [21]. In particular, pressure-driven membrane processes such as microfiltration (MF), ultrafiltration (UF), nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO), as well as integrated systems, have been increasingly studied over the last few years for the extraction, purification, fractionation and concentration of biologically active compounds from different agro-food products and by-products [22][23][24][25]. These processes offer several advantages over competitive methodologies since they can be operated in mild operating temperatures, thus favoring the preservation of nutrients and flavor components; additional advantages include small area-requirement, no use of chemical additives, high separation efficiency and easy scale-up.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retention of these compounds occurs partially due to the interaction with other specific compounds (Meija et al., 2019). Cassano et al., 2019 presented results on the clarification of aqueous extracts from red wine corks through microfiltration using a PVDF hollow fiber membrane and observed a retention of 11.12% of anthocyanins. Meija et al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%