Current Developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering 2020
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-819854-4.00014-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Membrane bioreactors sludge: From production to disposal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These coupled systems deal with sludge development due to the growth/decay of microorganisms, which is unavoidable in both processes. Apart from the different operating conditions of the two systems (MBR has higher sludge retention time (SRT)), there are also differences in the quality of the resulting sludge at the end of wastewater treatment [13,49]. Massé et al and Fenu et al compared sludge morphology in CAS and MBR systems and showed that the larger size CAS flocs aggregation forms (≈200 μm) consisted of more filamentous bacteria than in MBR, which consisted of smaller flocs (≈50 μm) with more non-flocculating bacteria [50,51].…”
Section: Mbr Sludgementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These coupled systems deal with sludge development due to the growth/decay of microorganisms, which is unavoidable in both processes. Apart from the different operating conditions of the two systems (MBR has higher sludge retention time (SRT)), there are also differences in the quality of the resulting sludge at the end of wastewater treatment [13,49]. Massé et al and Fenu et al compared sludge morphology in CAS and MBR systems and showed that the larger size CAS flocs aggregation forms (≈200 μm) consisted of more filamentous bacteria than in MBR, which consisted of smaller flocs (≈50 μm) with more non-flocculating bacteria [50,51].…”
Section: Mbr Sludgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Massé et al and Fenu et al compared sludge morphology in CAS and MBR systems and showed that the larger size CAS flocs aggregation forms (≈200 μm) consisted of more filamentous bacteria than in MBR, which consisted of smaller flocs (≈50 μm) with more non-flocculating bacteria [50,51]. Floc aggregation is related to extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), which are the third component between water and the cells most present in the sludge [13]. EPS is the product of bacteria and can account for about 80% of the total mass of the sludge and is responsible for the structural and functional integrity of the flocks [52].…”
Section: Mbr Sludgementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations