2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Membrane separation processes for dehydration of bioethanol from fermentation broths: Recent developments, challenges, and prospects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The result of optimization from tensile strength of the PES-biopolymer pervaporation membrane (with optimum value of tensile strength of 0.242 kgf/cm 2 with the actual result of 0.245 kgf/cm 2 ) shows that the influence of chitosan alginate coating on PES membrane is quite strong although PES membrane is mechanically strong enough. This is due to alginate and chitosan have good adhesiveness, good film formation, biocompatibility, and easy to modify [2]. Compared to the control group, PES membrane, without chitosan alginate coating which has an average value of tensile strength of 0.2114 kgf/cm 2 , is still found to be lower than the tensile strength of PES membrane of 0.245 kgf/cm 2 with 3.247% alginate and chitosan concentration of 2.909%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The result of optimization from tensile strength of the PES-biopolymer pervaporation membrane (with optimum value of tensile strength of 0.242 kgf/cm 2 with the actual result of 0.245 kgf/cm 2 ) shows that the influence of chitosan alginate coating on PES membrane is quite strong although PES membrane is mechanically strong enough. This is due to alginate and chitosan have good adhesiveness, good film formation, biocompatibility, and easy to modify [2]. Compared to the control group, PES membrane, without chitosan alginate coating which has an average value of tensile strength of 0.2114 kgf/cm 2 , is still found to be lower than the tensile strength of PES membrane of 0.245 kgf/cm 2 with 3.247% alginate and chitosan concentration of 2.909%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Before it can be used, the process of separating and purifying bioethanol are essential steps that must be passed because bioethanol as biofuel must have a purity of at least 99.5%. The widely used technology at this stage is conventional distillation [2]. Pervaporation (PV) is a separation process using membranes with different pressure from the driving force.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10] Compared to the traditional separation technology, membrane separation is more energy saving, easier to operate, and does not produce secondary pollution during the efficient separation of pollutant emissions; thus, it has great potential in the separation of water contaminants and water purication. [11][12][13] As a two-dimensional nanomaterial researched widely in membrane separation, graphene oxide (GO) has been considered a strong competitor for liquid separation owing to its monoatomic thickness, lamellar structure, good membraneforming ability, excellent mechanical strength and exibility, and easy mass production characteristics. [14][15][16] However, there is no strong interaction between adjacent GO layers, thus leading to an expanded GO membrane when dispersed in an aqueous solution, which seriously affects the performance of the GO membrane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 In spite of the blessed of 185 billion tons of coal reserves, total coal energy contribution is only 7.89% in the country. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Coal that contained high moisture content has the benefit of high volatile matter, low cost of mining, lower sulfur contents, heavy metals, and nitrogen. The conventional coal produces SO 2 , toxic volatile compounds, NO x , and particulate matter that is dangerous; therefore, clean fuels are emerging as alternatives, which can be recovered using different process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional coal produces SO 2 , toxic volatile compounds, NO x , and particulate matter that is dangerous; therefore, clean fuels are emerging as alternatives, which can be recovered using different process. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Coal that contained high moisture content has the benefit of high volatile matter, low cost of mining, lower sulfur contents, heavy metals, and nitrogen. [15][16][17] Coal slurry could be a combination of small-grained coal in the presence of water that might be utilized for direct combustion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%