1975
DOI: 10.1002/aic.690210603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Membrane ultrafiltration of a nonionic surfactant and inorganic salts from complex aqueous suspensions: Design for water reuse

Abstract: Complex aqueous suspensions containing a nonionic surfactant, phosphates, silicate, hypochlorite, oil, and kaolinite particulates are subjected to continuous flow membrane ultrafiltration with noncellulosic membranes. The ultrafiltrate water flux and the rejections by the Millipore PSAL membrane of total organic carbon, surfactant, and total phosphate are related by stepwise, multiple linear regression analysis (logarithmic model) to transmembrane pressure difference, thin channel velocity, membrane resistance… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This process produces a dilute ultrafiltrate (permeate) stream and a concentrate stream only 5 to 10% of the raw feed stream. Depending on the type of waste (size of organic molecules) and the nature of the membrane (polymer type and pore size), the ultrafiltrate stream can meet water quality guidelines for direct discharge (I, 2) and/or water reuse (3,4). However, performance limitations (flux drop) may be encountered during ultrafiltration due to the high-flux characteristics of the membranes, which result in the rapid convection of retained solutes to the membrane surface and the well-documented phenomenon of concentration polarization or gel formation (membrane fouling).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process produces a dilute ultrafiltrate (permeate) stream and a concentrate stream only 5 to 10% of the raw feed stream. Depending on the type of waste (size of organic molecules) and the nature of the membrane (polymer type and pore size), the ultrafiltrate stream can meet water quality guidelines for direct discharge (I, 2) and/or water reuse (3,4). However, performance limitations (flux drop) may be encountered during ultrafiltration due to the high-flux characteristics of the membranes, which result in the rapid convection of retained solutes to the membrane surface and the well-documented phenomenon of concentration polarization or gel formation (membrane fouling).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of temperature on Lead removal were investigated at a varying range of temperatures (25,30, and 50°C) for five hours. Temperatures were adjusted using a temperature controlled orbital shaker.…”
Section: Effects Of Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these results, the rejection of other suspected carcinogenic compounds, such as anthracene (solubility 0.07 mgliter), phen a n t h r e n e (solubility 1.3 mg/liter), a n d biphenyl (solubility 7 mglliter), will be greater than 95%. Based on the above procedure [24], it can be computed that the approximate removals at " r = 0.9" of gasification wastewater components (after H2S, NH,, and phenol stripping) would be: phenol = 88.1%; cresol, dimethylphenol, resorcinol, naphthol, a n d catechol = 90.3%-92.6%; naphthalene and anthracene = 94-96%; and The removals of ammonia and nitrate (present in gasification waters) are expected to be 97.3-99% (6) with thin-film composite membranes. For low-pressure membranes, the removals (at r = 0.9) of phenolics would be 10-15% lower and salt removals would still be 90%-91%.…”
Section: Solution Ph Ond Concentrotion Effects On Orgonic Solute Rejementioning
confidence: 99%