1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf00144745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Memorandum on the infections hazards of the common communion cup with especial reference to aids

Abstract: Bacteriological studies on the communion cup have shown that there is a low level of contamination with mouth organisms on the rim. The death rate of bacteria on the cup surface would not be significant, but the wine had a bactericidal effect on most but not all organisms tested. However droplets of saliva did not readily mix with the wine. In considering the spread of AIDS, extensive studies of people infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in hospital or at home have shown that the established route… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of potential pathogens are those that are transmitted via saliva, oral/labial skin lesions, fecal-orally, or droplet and airborne routes. [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] In 1946 Burrows demonstrated that when human volunteers shared a communion cup, with instructions to get as much saliva as possible on the rim, bacteria were recovered in small numbers. 18 In 1967 Gregory showed that in a more realistic simulation of a communion service, various species of bacteria could be recovered from the cup, including staphylococci, Neisseria species, betahemolytic and non-hemolytic streptococci, and Micrococcus species.…”
Section: The Common Communion Chalicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of potential pathogens are those that are transmitted via saliva, oral/labial skin lesions, fecal-orally, or droplet and airborne routes. [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] In 1946 Burrows demonstrated that when human volunteers shared a communion cup, with instructions to get as much saliva as possible on the rim, bacteria were recovered in small numbers. 18 In 1967 Gregory showed that in a more realistic simulation of a communion service, various species of bacteria could be recovered from the cup, including staphylococci, Neisseria species, betahemolytic and non-hemolytic streptococci, and Micrococcus species.…”
Section: The Common Communion Chalicementioning
confidence: 99%