1994
DOI: 10.2190/m2mb-a6rd-2nem-jkd1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Memory and Hypnosis: A Comparative Analysis of Guided Memory, Cognitive Interview, and Hypnotic Hypermnesia

Abstract: This study compared the relative efficacy of four popular methods of memory retrieval: hypnosis, “Guided Memory,” “Cognitive Interview,” and spontaneous free recall. These retrieval methods, tested in an academic setting, were paired with different intake methods, utilizing audio, visual, audio-visual, and reading inputs. All interview sessions, including hypnosis induction, were conducted individually and only free recall (as opposed to forced recall) techniques were used by the interviewers. The number of su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In attempts to evaluate the efficacy of the CI, it has been compared with other interview procedures such as the typical police interview (standard interview), the Guided Memory Interview (Memon and Downloaded by [Stockholm University Library] at 11:53 12 August 2015 Bull, 1991), the Structured Interview (see Koehnken, Thurer and Zorberbier, 1994;Memon et al, , 1997a, and hypnosis (Geiselman, Fisher, MacKinnon and Holland, 1985;DasGupta, Juza, White and Maloney, 1995). We will not focus on hypnosis here given the lack of clear evidence that it can facilitate recall (e. g., Dinges et al, 1992), the controversy surrounding the use of hypnosis (Pinizzotto, 1989) and the ambiguity about exactly what techniques are used in a hypnosis interview.…”
Section: Compurison Interviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In attempts to evaluate the efficacy of the CI, it has been compared with other interview procedures such as the typical police interview (standard interview), the Guided Memory Interview (Memon and Downloaded by [Stockholm University Library] at 11:53 12 August 2015 Bull, 1991), the Structured Interview (see Koehnken, Thurer and Zorberbier, 1994;Memon et al, , 1997a, and hypnosis (Geiselman, Fisher, MacKinnon and Holland, 1985;DasGupta, Juza, White and Maloney, 1995). We will not focus on hypnosis here given the lack of clear evidence that it can facilitate recall (e. g., Dinges et al, 1992), the controversy surrounding the use of hypnosis (Pinizzotto, 1989) and the ambiguity about exactly what techniques are used in a hypnosis interview.…”
Section: Compurison Interviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will not focus on hypnosis here given the lack of clear evidence that it can facilitate recall (e. g., Dinges et al, 1992), the controversy surrounding the use of hypnosis (Pinizzotto, 1989) and the ambiguity about exactly what techniques are used in a hypnosis interview. Instead we refer readers to a recent reviews by Fisher (1995) and DasGupta et al (1995) where the cognitive interview is compared with hypnosis.…”
Section: Compurison Interviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in the number of recall tests might have accounted for the fact that recall in hypnosis and cognitive interview conditions was comparable and superior to that of the standard police interview. Other investigations have found no differences across hypnosis and CR procedures [52] or mixed support for the superiority of hypnosis [28]. Comparable performance between hypnosis and CR is not surprising in that in some studies the two procedures invite participants to "change their mental perspective and encourage them to indulge in fantasy, imagination, and visualization in an atmosphere conducive to focus and concentration" [52, p. 119].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%