1987
DOI: 10.1080/01688638708405055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Memory assessment in neuropsychology: Theoretical considerations and practical utility

Abstract: Memory assessment is one of the principal objectives of neuropsychological evaluation. Yet, careful examination reveals very clear shortcomings in the memory tests employed by neuropsychologists. Specifically, most procedures are selected on the basis of their ability to detect structural brain pathology rather than their ability to assess memory performance per se or the constituent operations that underlie it. This paper addresses the shortcomings in the structure of several representative memory tests in ne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some may argue that the selective reminding procedures, as used in this study, are not comparable to other measures of episodic memory, because they rely on feedback that is tailored to the individual, that is, only a portion of the list that was not immediately recalled is presented for learning. Therefore, decline on the SRT may be related to executive compromise and not exclusively to the ability to remember words (Loring & Papanicolaou, 1987). However, in prodromal AD, early executive compromise has been noted by others ) and may explain why SRT procedures were useful in distinguishing our CDR0 subjects who subsequently declined.…”
Section: Dm Rentz Et Almentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Some may argue that the selective reminding procedures, as used in this study, are not comparable to other measures of episodic memory, because they rely on feedback that is tailored to the individual, that is, only a portion of the list that was not immediately recalled is presented for learning. Therefore, decline on the SRT may be related to executive compromise and not exclusively to the ability to remember words (Loring & Papanicolaou, 1987). However, in prodromal AD, early executive compromise has been noted by others ) and may explain why SRT procedures were useful in distinguishing our CDR0 subjects who subsequently declined.…”
Section: Dm Rentz Et Almentioning
confidence: 94%
“…8,9 When the scale was subsequently formally revised, significant problems were quickly identified with the WMS-R, 10 although the increased normative information was a significant improvement. The WMS-III addressed many WMS-R concerns, but clinical experience after its release failed to replicate the factor structure reported at publication.…”
Section: Wechsler Memory Scale-fourth Edi-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as Loring and Papanicolaou (1987) point out, our constructs of cognitive operations should not be based solely on tests sensitive to brain damage. In other words, although the CRM renders discriminating data, we are not yet certain if it measures memory, attention, visual perception, a combination of these, or other cognitive operations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%