2016
DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Memory-based attention capture when multiple items are maintained in visual working memory.

Abstract: Efficient visual search requires that attention is guided strategically to relevant objects, and most theories of visual search implement this function by means of a target template maintained in visual working memory (VWM). However, there is currently debate over the architecture of VWM-based attentional guidance. We contrasted a single-item-template hypothesis with a multiple-item-template hypothesis, which differ in their claims about structural limits on the interaction between VWM representations and perc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

22
163
4
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
22
163
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a related method using a static search target, attention was captured by a memory-matching distractor when a single color was held in VWM but not when multiple colors were held in VWM (van Moorselaar, Theeuwes, & Olivers, 2014), again indicating a limit on the number of items interacting with selection. However, Hollingworth and Beck (2016) found reliable memory-based capture when more than one item was maintained in VWM, and capture magnitude scaled with the number of matching distractors in the display, consistent with the MIT.…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
“…In a related method using a static search target, attention was captured by a memory-matching distractor when a single color was held in VWM but not when multiple colors were held in VWM (van Moorselaar, Theeuwes, & Olivers, 2014), again indicating a limit on the number of items interacting with selection. However, Hollingworth and Beck (2016) found reliable memory-based capture when more than one item was maintained in VWM, and capture magnitude scaled with the number of matching distractors in the display, consistent with the MIT.…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
“…As a result, the combined memory-driven capture effect for M1 and M2 should be significantly larger than the Cued object. The Experiment 5 aimed to examine whether the combined memory-driven capture effect for M1 and M2 is larger than the Cued object by presenting two distractors matching two memory items in visual search 27 . RTs shorter than 200 ms and no response trials were excluded (0.89% of trials).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because previous studies on memory-driven capture have produced mixed findings, and were generally based on small samples, we feel that it is important to establish whether memorydriven capture can indeed occur with a memory load of two items (as claimed by Hollingworth & Beck, 2016) or only with a memory load of one item (as claimed by Van Moorselaar et al, 2014). We replicated Van Moorselaar and colleagues' (2014) first (singleton-shape task) experiment using the original procedure.…”
Section: Replication Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Recently, Hollingworth and Beck (2016) tested the homogenous-state account by means of a paradigm that combined a memory task with a visual-search task, similar (but not identical) to the paradigm used by Van Moorselaar et al (2014). Participants had to keep either one or two colors in VWM, after which a visual-search task ensued; participants had to indicate the REPLICATION MANUSCRIPT 6 orientation of a target among seven other distractors.…”
Section: Replication Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation