Cooling devices were implanted bilaterally at four points along the inferotemporal (IT) cortex in three monkeys. Cooling any of the three anterior pairs disrupted performance on a visual memory task (delayed match-to-sample) uniformly over delays of 0, 15, 30, and 45 sec. Cooling the most posterior cryode had no effect. Cooling any of the cryodes had no effect on retention of a discrimination between horizontal and vertical stripes. With a focus at the second cryode from anterior, there was significant impairment on learning an object discrimination. With the same focus, a deficit was also found in retention of multiple object discriminations, but there was no deficit in retention of multiple black-white patterns. The anterior two cryodes were then interconnected, as were the posterior two cryodes, so that the anterior or posterior half of IT could be cooled. The animals were tested on retention of a mix of black-white patterns and objects. There were greater deficits on objects anteriorly and patterns posteriorly, but this was marginally below statistically acceptable levels. The four pairs of probes were each cooled separately during tests of retention of discrimination of monkey faces. A depression of scores was produced by all four cryodes, but more at the third from anterior. We suggest that IT is differentiated in the way it processes stimuli, not in the localization of such processes as attention, perception, and learning.In a previous experiment Horel and Pytko (1982) used a cooling device to explore the temporal lobe with small reversible lesions. The behavioral measure was a trialunique delayed match-to-sample (DMS) (Mishkin & Delacour, 1975;Overman & Doty, 1980). One temporal lobe was removed, and the cooling probe was moved from place to place in and around the remaining temporal lobe. The only place where a deficit could be consistently produced with this method was in the anterior 9 mm of the temporal lobe. Subsequently, Horel, Voytko, and Salsbury (1984) permanently implanted two cooling devices bilaterally over the cortex in this area in three monkeys. When only one or the other of these two pairs of cryodes was cooled, a deficit was produced at all delays (0, 15, 30, and 45 sec), but it was worse, approaching chance, at the longest delays. But when both pair of cryodes were cooled, suppressing the function of the entire area that had been identified in the previous experiment (Horel & Pytko, 1982), performance dropped to chance at all delays and remained poor even with a simultaneous matchto-sample in which all stimuli were present and the animal had to compare them across only the three windows to This work was supported by NINCDS Grant NS 1829-02. The author wishes to thank Dorothy Joiner for training the animals, Kent Salsbury for constructing the cryodes, Timothy Horel for the equation used in Figure 6, Mary Voytko for critical reading of the manuscript, and Penny Coo for typing the manuscript.The author's mailing address is: Department of Anatomy, State University of New York, Upstate Medic...