2013
DOI: 10.3149/csm.0502.106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Men and Masculinities in Higher Education: Introduction to a Special Issue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, it does not seem to draw on the notion of a hidden curriculum, although gender has been a topic of interest (e.g. Laker 2011;Pasque 2011;Sax 2008). Instead, models of identity development incorporate student-faculty interactions into, for example, context (e.g.…”
Section: Inspirational People During Emerging Adulthoodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, it does not seem to draw on the notion of a hidden curriculum, although gender has been a topic of interest (e.g. Laker 2011;Pasque 2011;Sax 2008). Instead, models of identity development incorporate student-faculty interactions into, for example, context (e.g.…”
Section: Inspirational People During Emerging Adulthoodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This endeavor is often represented as an effort to correct the misconceptions and poor reputation that plagues male college students in student affairs. Advocates typically argue that strategies intended to address college men's problematic behaviors need to be rooted in pedagogy and programming that can acknowledge and make visible their socialized gender identity (Davis, 2002;Edwards & Jones;Harris, 2010;Laker, 2005;Laker & Davis, 2011). Furthermore, exclusive reliance on disciplinary action is considered counterproductive.…”
Section: Developmental Models For College Menmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laker's (2005) influential dissertation highlights how student affairs practices can inadvertently leave the underlying behavioral issues intact by treating college men as "bad dogs", relying on criticism, shame, and punishment instead of reflection and mediation. Such strategies ultimately fail to disrupt problematic performances of masculinity, thereby leaving systemic patriarchy undisturbed on campus (Laker & Davis, 2011). It similarly suggests that addressing the gender gap in study-abroad programming cannot be achieved through a deficit-based approach.…”
Section: Developmental Models For College Menmentioning
confidence: 99%