Men's and Women's Consciousness of Gender Inequality: Austria, West Germany, Great Britain, and the United States

Abstract

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. . American Sociological Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to American Sociological Review.A model explaining consciousness of gender inequality is tested using data for the United States, Great Britain, West Germany, and Austria. Well-educated people tend to be less favorable toward efforts to reduce gender inequality than less well-educated people. Women with employed husbands are less supportive of efforts to reduce gender inequality than women without a male wage earner. Women are more likely to perceive gender inequality than men and are more supportive of efforts to combat gender inequality. These findings differ from findings in prior U.S. research. Moreover, U.S. women are unique in several respects, including a positive influence of labor force participation on support for efforts to reduce gender inequality. Ourfindings call into question the generalizability of U.S. studies.Nearly a quarter of a century has passed since the feminist movement began a resurgence in the United States in the mid-1960s. Within a few years, second-wave feminist movements had sprung up throughout Europe. Although the specific causes underlying these movements differed from country to country, a common factor was a growing awareness of gender inequalities in the workplace and home and a growing belief that these inequalities were sufficiently unjust that they should be eliminated.In studies of U.S. women and men, attitudes toward gender inequality have been associated with employment and family structure (Mason and Bumpass 1975; Cherlin and Walters 1981; Thomton, Alwin, and Camburn 1983; Smith 1985; Plutzer 1988). However, because these studies have not been replicated in other countries, it is unknown whether findings for the U.S. apply to other societies. We propose a model of consciousness of gender inequality based, in part, on hypotheses derived from prior research in the U.S., then test its generalizability using national survey data of women and men in four Westem societies -the United States, Great Britain, West Germany, and Austria. THEORETICAL BACKGROUNDDrawing on models of class awareness or consciousness (e.g., Giddens 1973, pp. 112-6), we assume that individuals must first perceive that inequality exists, and then decide that this ine-* Direct all correspondence to Nancy J. Davis, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, 331 Asbury Hall, DePauw University, Greencastle, IN 46135. The authors quality is sufficiently unfair that some corrective action is warranted. Consciousness of inequality includes the self-awareness of subordinate groups as well as awareness of inequality on the part of those who are not disadvantaged. By this definiti...

Determinanten traditionell-sexistischer Einstellungen in Deutschland – eine Analyse mit Allbus-Daten

“…hopf 1999;Rippl 2002;heyder 2003) und sexistischen einstellungen im besonderen einher (Thornton et al 1983, davis und Robinson 1991Rhodebeck 1996;bryant 2003;bolzendahl und Myers 2004 dementsprechend gilt in der literatur der Zusammenhang zwischen weiblicher berufstätigkeit und egalitären einstellungen als ein robuster befund (vgl. z. b.…”

Gendered Characteristics of Political Engagement in College Students

“…Perception of gender inequality is, at least in part, an indicator of gender role consciousness (Davis & Robinson, 1991). As women and men are socialized in terms of their gender roles in society they become more or less conscious of the role of gender in their political world.…”

Swedish Professionals and Gender Inequalities

“…It is possible that government and union policies are enforced more in the public sector. In addition, gender differences can be expected to be smaller among the younger employees because they will have been affected more by the feminist movement of the 1960s and 1970s (Davis & Robinson 1991).…”