The measurement and calculation of tensile modulus could be more clearly explained, in particular the dimensions that were recorded during each test (with reference to Fig. 1b, or diagram) and how the measurements at each strain were processed to obtain the data presented in Fig. 6. Also, why were the same tests not performed on native meniscus for direct comparison?Data presented in Fig. 6 were obtained using standard calculations to derive the elastic modulus of materials based on stress-strain curves. In order to better characterize the dimensions recorded, the description has been revised as follows:"Changes in dimensions during loading were obtained with a digital image analysis system (Adapted QuickCam® Pro 3000, Logitech Europe S.A., Switzerland and the GNU Image Manipulation Program, www.gimp.org), and were always lower than 10% of the gauge length considered." (Methods, page 6,1 st paragraph). The same tensile tests could not be performed on the inner or outer regions of native meniscus: in fact, out of those regions, having a semilunar shape, it would not be possible to punch ring-shaped specimens. This is now discussed in the following sentence: We now clarify that "Since the mechanical properties of the non-woven mesh scaffold used are negligible, the mechanical functionality of the bi-zonal engineered constructs was mainly due to the differential deposition of extracellular matrix by chondrocytes." (Discussion, page 9, last paragraph) and discuss that "The HYAFF
® -11 non-woven meshes used in this study were supportive of the formation of bi-zonal tissues. The composition and open structure of the meshes may have contributed respectively to the deposition of GAG in the inner region and to the outgrowth of cells towards the outer capsule. " (Discussion, page 8, last paragraph)To what extent might these differences also be accounted for by the increase in cell number and viability when cultured under dynamic as opposed to static conditions? Likewise, is the preferential orientation of the collagen fibers not due simply to the increased rate of growth of the fibrous capsule when cultured under conditions of improved mass transport rather than hydrodynamic shear per se (N.B. the RCCS is considered a low shear environment)?We now describe that "In the outer capsule, cells were elongated and at a higher density than in the central region" (Results, Page 6, last paragraph) and discuss that "More fundamental studies would be required to determine the role of increased mass transport and/or increased cell density following application of hydrodynamic flow in the development of the bi-zonal tissues." (Page 9, 1 st paragraph) The term has been deleted.Methods p3, line 13: replace 'due to' with 'to account for ' The change has been made. Yes, the volume of medium was in each case equivalent to 10 ml per construct p4, line 9: The constructs were examined blind.The change has been made. The change has been made. The sentence now reads "SEM analysis indicated that collagen fibers were randomly oriented in the ...