2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meniscal scaffolds: Early experience and review of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
56
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, processing of ovine meniscus tissue to improve porosity and interconnectivity as a xenogeneic meniscus scaffold has potential. 54 There are growing data to show that the use of dynamic culture or fluid mixing can be optimized to modulate the spatial heterogeneity of engineered menisci as well as the correlated mechanical properties. [55][56][57] Compressive deformation or hydrostatic pressure has been shown to enhance the structure and function of engineered meniscus tissues.…”
Section: Biological Augmentation and Tissue Engineering Approaches Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, processing of ovine meniscus tissue to improve porosity and interconnectivity as a xenogeneic meniscus scaffold has potential. 54 There are growing data to show that the use of dynamic culture or fluid mixing can be optimized to modulate the spatial heterogeneity of engineered menisci as well as the correlated mechanical properties. [55][56][57] Compressive deformation or hydrostatic pressure has been shown to enhance the structure and function of engineered meniscus tissues.…”
Section: Biological Augmentation and Tissue Engineering Approaches Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some important limitations are still unsolved, including the possibility of a reduction in the size or complete degradation of the implant. In addition, tissue growth inside the implant must be further studied in vivo because some authors argue that the implant tissue should exhibit the same biomechanical characteristics as those of native meniscal tissue [28].…”
Section: Collagen Matrix Scaffoldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, the size of the CMI® reduced during follow-up [27][28][29]. Secondly, the signal intensity does not resemble that of the native meniscus, either for short follow-up [27,28] or for follow-up periods exceeding ten years [26,29].…”
Section: Partial Meniscal Substitutesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1c and d show a representative MRI of a CMI® implanted knee 12 months post-surgery. Based on second-look arthroscopies at a mean of 12.8 months and MR scans at a mean of 19 months, Spencer et al suggest that the regenerated tissue is not fibrocartilage [27]. Hence, the mechanism of action of the CMI® is not fully understood.…”
Section: Partial Meniscal Substitutesmentioning
confidence: 99%