2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2516.2002.00634.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Menorrhagia from a haematologist's point of view. Part I: initial evaluation

Abstract: The evaluation of menorrhagia should no longer be solely the task of the gynaecologist. In women with ovulatory bleeding (regular cycles), the prevalence of von Willebrand disease (vWD) in about 15% of these, as well as disorders of platelet function and fibrinolysis causing menorrhagia, warrants an active role by the haematologist. Initial intake should include documentation of menorrhagia by the pictorial chart assessment of menstrual flow. Baseline characteristics of menstrual flow should also be documented… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interference of menstrual periods with 7 activities of daily living was assessed using a Likert scale. 16,17 A scale of 0 to 10 was used with "0" being that menses "does not interfere" and "10" being that menses "completely interferes" with the daily activity. A global menstrual interference score was derived and examined for differences between the groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interference of menstrual periods with 7 activities of daily living was assessed using a Likert scale. 16,17 A scale of 0 to 10 was used with "0" being that menses "does not interfere" and "10" being that menses "completely interferes" with the daily activity. A global menstrual interference score was derived and examined for differences between the groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The articles have provided primary data on the prevalence of VWD in adult women with menorrhagia, showing a prevalence ranging from 5% to 20% in five published studies [2]. On the basis of literature data, Kouides [34] estimates that from an ideal cohort of 100 women referred to a gynaecologist, on the average 50% will have an identifiable anatomical or functional cause, 15% will have subnormal VWF level, (35) 29 (83%) 6 (17%) Type 1 affected (44) 17 (39%) 27 (61%) Type 3 affected (10) 1 (10%) 9 (90%) Total 160 (68%) 75 (32%)…”
Section: Menorrhagia In Other Haemorrhagic Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have to balance the pros and cons of labelling an otherwise healthy subject with an inherited haemostatic disorder with the expected benefits reasonably related to more specific treatments or prevention of future bleeding in case of haemostatic challenges like parturition, toot extraction, or surgery. So far, given the lack of definitive outcome data, there is insufficient evidence to support the suggestion for routine haemostatic investigation in women presenting with apparently isolated menorrhagia [34][35][36]. Furthermore, available diagnostic tools are not sufficiently efficient.…”
Section: Menorrhagia In Other Haemorrhagic Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the subjective symptoms of a heavy menstruation are more common and occur in about 23–44% of the general female population 5. A high prevalence (13–17%) of von Willebrand disease (VWD) among women with menorrhagia has been found by several studies 7–10. The prevalence of platelet dysfunction (PDF) among menorrhagic women is also considered to be substantial 11 and could amount to 20–30% 12.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%