2001
DOI: 10.1002/casp.639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mental health and identity: the evaluation of a drop‐in centre

Abstract: This paper is based on interviews with users of a drop-in centre run by a voluntary group. Using a grounded theory approach the paper argues that individuals' use of the drop-in is linked to the discursive strategies that they have developed to cope with stigma. Tajfel's Social Identity Theory is employed as a framework to examine how users manage the threat to their identity posed by the diagnosis and experience of mental illness. The implications of this research are examined within the context of the empowe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

5
25
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Identity is strongly dependent on the groups we belong to (Tajfel, 1981). Many people with mental illnesses are in a situation where they experience a conflict between the positive value of belonging to a group of other patients, and the danger of stigmatization resulting from being identified with that group (Hall & Cheston, 2002). It is of interest to gain insight into how they tackle this dilemma and negotiate their identities in different situations and contexts, where the dilemma between the need to belong and the danger of stigmatization is accentuated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identity is strongly dependent on the groups we belong to (Tajfel, 1981). Many people with mental illnesses are in a situation where they experience a conflict between the positive value of belonging to a group of other patients, and the danger of stigmatization resulting from being identified with that group (Hall & Cheston, 2002). It is of interest to gain insight into how they tackle this dilemma and negotiate their identities in different situations and contexts, where the dilemma between the need to belong and the danger of stigmatization is accentuated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corrignan, 1998;Corrignan, Thompson, Lambert, Sangster, Noel, & Campbell, 2003;Crisp, 2005;Crisp, Gelder, Rix, Meltzer, & Rowlands, 2000;Holmes & Phillip, 1998;Overton & Medina, 2008;Stewart, Keel, & Schiavo, 2006). Research investigating groups perceived to be lower in status, including people with mental health problems (Basic Behavioural Science Task Force of the National Advisory Mental Health Council, 1996;Hall & Cheston, 2002;Iqbal, Birchwood, Chadwick, & Trower, 2000), and also ethnic minority groups and women (Katz, Joiner Jr., & Kwon, 2002;Tajfel & Turner, 1979) has linked membership of a devalued social group to negative consequences for social identity and emotional health, such as an increased risk for depression and low self-esteem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People who have mental health problems are perceived by some members of society to belong to a lower status group (Hall & Cheston, 2002) and can experience stigmatisation and discrimination (e.g. Corrignan, 1998;Corrignan, Thompson, Lambert, Sangster, Noel, & Campbell, 2003;Crisp, 2005;Crisp, Gelder, Rix, Meltzer, & Rowlands, 2000;Holmes & Phillip, 1998;Overton & Medina, 2008;Stewart, Keel, & Schiavo, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Day centres can be heterogeneous landscapes, with imagined and real boundaries, as well as spaces of performance and negotiation based on the consensual psychological and behavioural norms associated with cultural perceptions regarding mental distress. However, these positions of multiplicity can create tensions, which trouble the notion that day centres always provide a therapeutic space (Hall & Cheston, 2002). Furthermore, knowledge of how day centres are structurally organised, such as through the specificity of functions of certain rooms (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently day centres can form spaces that provide a platform from which a micro collective of 'us' (service users) versus 'them' (the wider society) can emerge (Conradson, 2003). As such the somewhat romanticised notion of day centres being a space that facilitate mutual emotional support and socialisation may not relate to the everyday practices through which such spaces are produced (Hall & Cheston, 2002). In this paper we seek to understand how perceived diagnostic identities come to act as affective forces that order and shape the social relations that constitute day centre space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%