2016
DOI: 10.1080/08039488.2016.1236400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mentally disordered offenders in Sweden: differentiating recidivists from non-recidivists in a 10-year follow-up study

Abstract: Signs of childhood adversities together with early debut in criminality appeared as important risk factors for general and violent recidivism. Forensic psychiatric treatment combined with a restriction order was demonstrated as a protective factor against recidivism, suggesting that the risk of recidivism is strongly related to the level of supervision. Although the low number of recidivism cases is highly desirable, it unfortunately reduces the power of the analyses in this paper.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A cluster B personality disorder, age at first crime and age at FPI emerged as important in both models, similar to previously published findings from the full UPPRÄTT-Malmö cohort [45]. Partial dependence plots revealed that younger age at first crime as well as younger age at FPI increased the probability of being classified as a recidivist in both the Baseline and the Extended model.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A cluster B personality disorder, age at first crime and age at FPI emerged as important in both models, similar to previously published findings from the full UPPRÄTT-Malmö cohort [45]. Partial dependence plots revealed that younger age at first crime as well as younger age at FPI increased the probability of being classified as a recidivist in both the Baseline and the Extended model.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The UPPRÄTT-Malmö study is a nationally representative, total cohort of patients living in the Malmö University Hospital catchment area who, after committing a crime, underwent either a major forensic psychiatric investigation (FPI, N = 97) or a minor forensic psychiatric screening report ( N = 28) between 1999 and 2005, and subsequently were sentenced to involuntary forensic psychiatric in-patient treatment. One previous study has investigated recidivism using traditional risk factors [45], and one previous study has investigated predictors of length of stay [46], both using the full UPPRÄTT-Malmö sample. When study inclusion commenced, FPI investigees were routinely being referred for a neuroimaging assessment, but due to changes in the local FPI procedures during study inclusion, only 50 participants underwent this assessment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite being a combined subset of psychiatric patients and criminal offenders, the assessment and treatment of FP patients cannot simply be extrapolated from general psychiatry or programs within prison and probation services. For example, FP patients frequently have poor literacy skills (7), low motivation for assessment and treatment (8), suffer from multiple psychiatric disorders (6,9), and are involuntarily restricted in their interactions with their community. Unfortunately, for former FP patients and for society at large, reoffending and readmission are common after discharge (10), and increase with length of follow-up (11,12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the frequency of medication prescribed upon release was already high in the first group, there was still a significant increase, leading to almost all former detainees receiving psychotropic medication in the second group. The prison governors (interviews 2 + 3) as well as the psychiatric expert (interview 5) emphasised their importance in supporting the avoidance of recidivism, especially concerning detainees suffering from schizophrenia (Fazel, Zetterqvist, Larsson, Långström, & Lichtenstein, 2014; Krona et al, 2017; Seifert, Klink & Landwehr, 2018). In their view, the detainees' compliance had increased over the years due to the reduction of side effects and the extension of the time between the administrations of the medication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%