2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2012.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mercury’s radius change estimates revisited using MESSENGER data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
31
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these estimates of radius change differ by 1-1.6 km, values obtained by both methods are substantially greater than those from earlier photogeological studies 5,8,11,12 . Previous reports of 0.8-2 km of radial shortening 5,8,11 were derived from analyses of the 45% of Mercury's surface imaged by Mariner 10.…”
Section: Planetary Radius Changecontrasting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although these estimates of radius change differ by 1-1.6 km, values obtained by both methods are substantially greater than those from earlier photogeological studies 5,8,11,12 . Previous reports of 0.8-2 km of radial shortening 5,8,11 were derived from analyses of the 45% of Mercury's surface imaged by Mariner 10.…”
Section: Planetary Radius Changecontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…To enable a direct comparison between this work and preceding studies of Mercury's global contraction 8,11,12 , we also used those same 216 structures to define a scaling factor (γ ) between maximum fault displacement (D max ) and fault length (L) for extrapolation to all mapped landforms (following the methodology of ref. 11).…”
Section: Planetary Radius Changementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Byrne et al, 2014;Di Achille et al, 2012). Wrinkle ridges (see Korteniemi, Walsh, & Hughes, 2015), although they are considered a 'contractional feature', were mapped separately as they are typically located within smooth plains (SP; e.g.…”
Section: Geodatabase Structure and Line Drawingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strom et al 1975;Watters et al 1998Watters et al , 2009Di Achille et al 2012) and those predicted by thermal evolution models (e.g. Solomon 1977;Dombard & Hauck 2008), with those from the first approach typically about 1-3 km but those from modelling of the order of 5-10 km.…”
Section: Distribution Of Tectonicsmentioning
confidence: 87%