2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b04187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mercury Wet Scavenging and Deposition Differences by Precipitation Type

Abstract: We analyze the effect of precipitation type on mercury wet deposition using a new database of individual rain events spanning the contiguous United States. Measurements from the Mercury Deposition Network (MDN) containing single rainfall events were identified and classified into six precipitation types. Mercury concentrations in surface precipitation follow a power law of precipitation depth that is modulated by precipitation system morphology. After controlling for precipitation depth, the highest mercury de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Precipitation amounts and the contribution of UT and MT together explain 55 % of the spatial variation in the observed Hg flux, while individually they explain 25 and 42 % of the spatial variation, respectively. This is consistent with previous studies that have shown higher Hg wet deposition flux in convective thunderstorms that can scavenge Hg(II) present at high altitudes (Guentzel et al, 2001;Shanley et al, 2015;Holmes et al, 2016;Kaulfus et al, 2017).…”
Section: Tagged Tracer Contributions At Mdn and Amnet Sitessupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Precipitation amounts and the contribution of UT and MT together explain 55 % of the spatial variation in the observed Hg flux, while individually they explain 25 and 42 % of the spatial variation, respectively. This is consistent with previous studies that have shown higher Hg wet deposition flux in convective thunderstorms that can scavenge Hg(II) present at high altitudes (Guentzel et al, 2001;Shanley et al, 2015;Holmes et al, 2016;Kaulfus et al, 2017).…”
Section: Tagged Tracer Contributions At Mdn and Amnet Sitessupporting
confidence: 93%
“…During the Nitrogen, Oxidants, Mercury, and Aerosol Distributions, Sources, and Sinks (NOMADSS) aircraft campaign, the highest Hg(II) concentrations (300-680 pg m −3 ) were observed in clean and dry air (CO < 75 ppbv and relative humidity (RH) < 35 %) originating in the subsiding air masses of the Pacific and the Atlantic subtropical anticyclones Shah et al, 2016). Furthermore, higher concentrations of Hg in precipitation are observed in thunderstorms reaching higher altitudes (Guentzel et al, 2001;Shanley et al, 2015;Holmes et al, 2016;Kaulfus et al, 2017), and higher Hg wet and dry deposition fluxes are associated with transport from the free troposphere Gustin et al, 2012;Huang and Gustin, 2012;Sheu and Lin, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other research attributed substantial contributions from local and regional Hg emissions sources to precipitation-Hg deposition in the Midwestern USA [19,20,54,55]. According to Holmes et al [56] and Kaulfus et al [57], warm weather, convective thunderstorms are believed to increase Hg deposition and this may be the case for many of the extreme episodes examined in this study. Such storms can incorporate additional GOM formed in the troposphere from GEM originating at local and regional sources [55], in addition to effective below-cloud and in-cloud scavenging of GOM, as described by Lynam et al [58].…”
Section: Percentage Ofmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Event-based wet precipitations (rain and snow) were collected for mercury (Hg) and trace element analyses. Though weekly collections are much more common, event-based precipitation samples provide the best opportunity to study how mercury is scavenging from the atmosphere [49]. The type of precipitation and meteorological conditions (start and end time of precipitation collection, air temperature during precipitation, wind direction, humidity, etc.)…”
Section: Sample Collection and Analytical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%