Merging connectivity rules and large‐scale condition assessment improves conservation adequacy in river systems

Abstract

Summary1. Conservation adequacy is defined as the ability of conservation measures to sustain biodiversity. Although river network connectivity is important for maintaining key ecological processes and ensuring persistence of biodiversity, it also facilitates the propagation of threats along river networks, which may compromise the sustainability of freshwater biodiversity and therefore conservation adequacy. This study aims to introduce two modifications to river conservation planning related to connectivity and catchment condition that together can improve the adequacy of the priority areas identified. This will establish an operational framework for end-users, such as policy makers and NGOs. 2. We operationalize the connectivity framework that has recently emerged in systematic river conservation planning by using a GIS coding system for catchment location in the conservation software package MARXAN. Additionally, we use a landscape measure of catchment disturbance to direct the conservation plan to the least-disturbed area while still meeting targets for the conservation of fish species used as surrogates for overall biodiversity in our study catchment, the Daly River in northern Australia. This proxy for condition aggregates information on land-use, extractive industries, point-source pollution, and water infrastructure. 3. We successfully modelled the distribution of 39 fish species based on GIS-derived landscape descriptors (most important descriptors were; discharge, distance to river mouth, geology and conductivity). 4. Results from the systematic planning analysis identified a portfolio of watersheds that delivered close to optimal upstream protection with around 4700 stream kilometres (30% of the total network). When using upstream disturbance as an extra penalty, most of the network stayed intact; however, a replacement area was found for a major tributary, which only added an extra 1% of the stream network to the total area. 5. Synthesis and applications. Improving conservation adequacy by accounting for upstream connectivity and condition using this easy-to-implement framework and software package has the potential to facilitate further application of systematic methods in river conservation planning. Furthermore, integrating condition as a discounting factor can also improve conservation adequacy in a broad range of environments (including terrestrial and marine), while not necessarily increasing the management costs.

Restricted by borders: trade-offs in transboundary conservation planning for large river systems

“…2011; Linke et al 2012). Due to the longitudinal connectedness of rivers, the long-term 79 persistence of freshwater biodiversity within a protected area strongly relies on the system's 80 capacity to maintain some key ecological process (e.g.…”

Floodplain fish communities in river systems in Bolivia: Current knowledge and addressing future research challenges

“…The development of technologies to capture data at very high spatial and temporal resolutions is making it possible to move from the conceptual theories of patterns and processes in riverscapes to the testing and practice of such theories (Carbonneau et al 2012). GIS and RS now provide the possibility of assessing river systems at broader spatial scales and hence incorporate condition assessment into conservation planning (Linke et al 2012). These advances, however, are highly dependent on data availability.…”

“…Merging species modeling with systematic conservation planning in river landscapes has provided a successful end user model conservation planning package (Linke et al 2012). However to achieve this level of information data at multiple scales is essential for floodplain river systems in the Bolivian Amazon.…”

A new stream and nested catchment framework for Australia

“…In particular, recent enhancements to conservation planning methods to account for catchment connectivity and condition (Linke et al, 2012) depend on the Pfafstetter coding and the broadscale indicators of disturbance provided by the new national framework. Catchment units extracted from this framework also provided planning units for the identification of priority areas for terrestrial biodiversity (Douglass et al, 2011;Klein et al, 2009a, b;Fuller et al, 2010).…”