2008
DOI: 10.1177/1475921708089823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Merging Sensor Data from Multiple Temperature Scenarios for Vibration Monitoring of Civil Structures

Abstract: The ambient temperature e ect may result in limitations of vibrationbased structural health monitoring (SHM) approaches for civil engineering structures. This paper addresses the issue of discriminating changes in modal parameters due to damages and changes in modal parameters due to temperature e ects. A n o n parametric damage detection algorithm is proposed, which only assumes that several datasets are recorded on the safe structure at di erent and unknown temperatures, and smoothes out the temperature e ec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(44 reference statements)
1
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the sensitivity of modal damage indicators is often not satisfying for a lot of real applications in civil engineering with ambient excitation and a limited number of sensors. Varying operational or environmental influences may have a greater impact on the dynamic properties of a system than structural damage in early stages [10,11]. Besides, civil structures differ from many other mechanical structures by their size and their uniqueness and therefore cannot undergo any kind of prototype testing, as it is common for products from e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the sensitivity of modal damage indicators is often not satisfying for a lot of real applications in civil engineering with ambient excitation and a limited number of sensors. Varying operational or environmental influences may have a greater impact on the dynamic properties of a system than structural damage in early stages [10,11]. Besides, civil structures differ from many other mechanical structures by their size and their uniqueness and therefore cannot undergo any kind of prototype testing, as it is common for products from e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thanks to this uncertainty quantification, the significance of the modal parameters and their changes during the monitoring period can be evaluated. Second, we perform the actual damage detection with a null space based statistical damage detection test [11,[21][22][23],…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following, the non-parametric damage detection test [1] based on [2,3] is described. Using measured data (y k ) k=1,...,N , a consistent estimate H p+1,q of the Hankel matrix is obtained from the empirical output covariances…”
Section: The Damage Detection Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The behavior of a structure is assumed to be described by a linear time-invariant (LTI) dynamical system MẌ (t) + CẊ (t) + K X (t) = υ(t) (1) where t denotes continuous time, M , C , K ∈ R d×d are the mass, damping and stiffness matrices respectively and X ∈ R d collects the displacements of the d degrees of freedom (DOF) of the structure. The external and non-measured force υ(t) is modeled as white noise.…”
Section: Models and Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation