2011
DOI: 10.1175/jcli-d-11-00015.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MERRA: NASA’s Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications

Abstract: The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) was undertaken by NASA’s Global Modeling and Assimilation Office with two primary objectives: to place observations from NASA’s Earth Observing System satellites into a climate context and to improve upon the hydrologic cycle represented in earlier generations of reanalyses. Focusing on the satellite era, from 1979 to the present, MERRA has achieved its goals with significant improvements in precipitation and water vapor climatology. H… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

44
3,214
2
10

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4,403 publications
(3,351 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
44
3,214
2
10
Order By: Relevance
“…For the reasons outlined above, global models such as the semi-empirical Horizontal Wind Model (HWM) (Drob et al, 2008 and reanalysis datasets such as the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) operational analyses (Dee et al, 2011) and NASAs ModernEra Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) (Rienecker et al, 2011) contain sparse information based on observations above 20 km, in contrast to the widespread operational data for the lower atmosphere. Systematic comparisons between co-located ground-based wind radiometer, lidar, and infrasound observations and reanalysis data found both temperature and horizontal wind speeds deviate increasingly above 40 km as the assimilated observations became sparser (Le Pichon et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the reasons outlined above, global models such as the semi-empirical Horizontal Wind Model (HWM) (Drob et al, 2008 and reanalysis datasets such as the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) operational analyses (Dee et al, 2011) and NASAs ModernEra Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) (Rienecker et al, 2011) contain sparse information based on observations above 20 km, in contrast to the widespread operational data for the lower atmosphere. Systematic comparisons between co-located ground-based wind radiometer, lidar, and infrasound observations and reanalysis data found both temperature and horizontal wind speeds deviate increasingly above 40 km as the assimilated observations became sparser (Le Pichon et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This period also encompasses a recent satellite-based global tropical cyclone intensity reanalysis 3 , and represents the most reliable period of the atmospheric reanalysis products [12][13][14] that provide information on the environmental changes that affect tropical cyclones.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decreased PI in the deep tropics and/or increased PI at higher latitudes could be expected to result in a similar migration. Here we explore these environmental factors using three different atmospheric reanalysis products, NCEP/NCAR 12 , ERA-Interim 13 , and MERRA 14 . All three products exhibit broad regions of increased shear in the deep tropics and decreased shear in the subtropics (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The (re)analysis products used in this study are 1) the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP)-National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) 40-Year Reanalysis (NCEP-NCAR hereafter; Kalnay et al 1996;Kistler et al 2001), 2) the NCEP-Department of Energy (DOE) Reanalysis 2 (NCEP-DOE hereafter; Kanamitsu et al 2002), 3) the NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR; Saha et al 2010), 4) the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA; Rienecker et al 2008, Rienecker et al 2011, 5) the ECMWF ERA-Interim (ERA-Int hereafter; Dee et al 2011), 6) the ECMWF operational analysis (ECMWF-op hereafter), and 7) the NCEP Final (FNL) operational Global Forecast System (GFS) analysis. Details of all these products can be found in Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%