2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.segan.2014.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meshed distribution network vs reinforcement to increase the distributed generation connection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is usually subjected to same issues and more or less same requirements as LDN. It has advantages of comparatively higher reliability, DG penetration, better voltage response (for DG critical voltage mode) and comparatively fewer power losses compared to LDN from objective viewpoint [74,75]. However, complex fault traceability makes is more susceptible to faults and early recovery from reliability viewpoint in traditional planning methods [76].…”
Section: Mesh Distribution Network (Mdn)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is usually subjected to same issues and more or less same requirements as LDN. It has advantages of comparatively higher reliability, DG penetration, better voltage response (for DG critical voltage mode) and comparatively fewer power losses compared to LDN from objective viewpoint [74,75]. However, complex fault traceability makes is more susceptible to faults and early recovery from reliability viewpoint in traditional planning methods [76].…”
Section: Mesh Distribution Network (Mdn)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The normal topologies in MDN include weakly mesh or all mesh [77,78]. The former mode is realized with topologies attain by closing a selective number of TS, whereas the later mode works under normal operation by closing all TS [12,14,26,75].…”
Section: Mesh Distribution Network (Mdn)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, this is the most straightforward and robust optimisation technique available as it is simple to understand (and easy to explain to DNOs, regulators and other actors) and guarantees finding the optimal solution under all conditions (even for complex mixed integer, nonlinear and nonconvex problems). On the other hand, this approach tends to be overlooked (particularly for academic applications) due to its simple nature and because it can be computationally expensive or even infeasible in most applications [41] [42]. In this light, the recursive function has been designed to significantly reduce the computational costs of the search by systematically terminating all instances that face an infeasible investment strategy (e.g., in this work, whenever the network fails to meet P2/6 recommendations), which also prevents them from spreading.…”
Section: "Optimisation" Recursive Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several works have been developed to investigate reinforcement issues in radial and meshed distribution level and to provide adequate simulation tools and methods. Alvarez-Herault et al [3] demonstrated the benefits of meshing the network instead of reinforcing it. Novoselnik et al [4] provided a procedure to improve networks' performance taking into consideration the advantage of its meshed development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%